izpis_h1_title_alt

Agriculture and environment : friends or foes? : conceptualising agri-environmental discourses under the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy
ID Rac, Ilona (Author), ID Erjavec, Karmen (Author), ID Erjavec, Emil (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (807,98 KB)
MD5: 9BA40F6F3CD7773E6708A2E68EB268EE
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-023-10474-y This link opens in a new window

Abstract
The European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), in addition to its primary production and farm income goals, is a large source of funding for environmentally friendly agricultural practices. However, its schemes have variable success and uptake across member states (MS) and regions. This study tries to explain these differences by demonstrating differences between policy levels in the understanding of the relationship between nature and farming. To compare constructs and values of the respective policy communities, their discursive construction as it appears in the main strategic EU and MS agricultural policy documents is analysed. The theoretical framework integrates elements from existing frameworks of CAP and environmental discourse analysis; specific agri-environmental discourses, their elements and interplay, are identified. The six discourses suggested here are ‘Productivism’, ‘Classical neoliberal’, ‘Ecological modernisation’, ‘Administrative’, ‘Multifunctionality’ and ‘Radical green’. The discourse analysis of selected documents reveals that there are indeed differences in how farming and the environment are generally conceptualised at different levels of CAP decision-making. At EU level, farming is primarily understood as a sector whose main task is to produce food (‘Productivism’), and the environment is used as a justification for CAP payments (‘Multifunctionality’). At the national/regional level, Rural Development Programmes reflect different value systems: in England, environmental protection is mainly seen as sound management of natural capital (‘Classical neoliberal’); in Finland, a benefit for producers and conscious consumers (‘Ecological modernisation’); in Croatia, a necessity limiting productivity (‘Productivism’) and imposed by an external authority (‘Administrative’ discourse). This diversity shows that differences can visibly manifest despite the Commission constraining the discursive space, helping to explain the differential implementation and success of environmental measures.

Language:English
Keywords:Common Agricultural Policy, CAP, agri-environmental discourse, European Union, member state, European Commission communication, rural development programme
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2024
Number of pages:Str. 147–166
Numbering:Vol. 41, iss. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-154727 This link opens in a new window
UDC:631:502
ISSN on article:1572-8366
DOI:10.1007/s10460-023-10474-y This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:157508867 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.02.2024
Views:119
Downloads:9
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Agriculture and human values
Publisher:Springer Nature
ISSN:1572-8366
COBISS.SI-ID:513116697 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:kmetijstvo, varstvo okolja, skupna kmetijska politika, CAP, razvoj podeželja, EU, diskurz

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back