izpis_h1_title_alt

Locomotor–respiratory entrainment upon phonated compared to spontaneous breathing during submaximal exercise
ID Potočnik, Maja Marija (Author), ID Edwards, Ian (Author), ID Potočnik, Nejka (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,51 MB)
MD5: 4A53762CEA2BB22A38557F0DD6247806
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2838 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Recently, increased attention to breathing techniques during exercise has addressed the need for more in-depth study of the ergogenic effects of breathing manipulation. The physiological effects of phonation, as a potential breathing tool, have not yet been studied. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the respiratory, metabolic and hemodynamic responses of phonated exhalation and its impact on locomotor–respiratory entrainment in young healthy adults during moderate exercise. Twenty-six young, healthy participants were subjected to peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements and a moderate steady cycling protocol based on three different breathing patterns (BrP): spontaneous breathing (BrP1), phonated breathing pronouncing “h” (BrP2) and phonated breathing pronouncing “ss” (BrP3). The heart rate, arterial blood pressure, oxygen consumption, CO$_2$ production, respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), respiratory exchange ratio and ventilatory equivalents for both important respiratory gasses (eqO$_2$ and eqCO$_2$) were measured (Cosmed, Italy) simultaneously during a short period of moderate stationary cycling at a predefined cadence. To evaluate the psychological outcomes, the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded after each cycling protocol. The locomotor–respiratory frequency coupling was calculated at each BrP, and dominant coupling was determined. Phonation gradually decreased the PEF (388 ± 54 L/min at BrP2 and 234 ± 54 L/min at BrP3 compared to 455 ± 42 L/min upon spontaneous breathing) and affected the RR (18.8 ± 5.0 min$^{−1}$ at BrP2 compared to 22.6 ± 5.5 min$^{−1}$ at BrP1 and 21.3 ± 7.2 min$^{−1}$ at BrP3), VT (2.33 ± 0.53 L at BrP2 compared to 1.86 ± 0.46 L at BrP1 and 2.00 ± 0.45 L at BrP3), dominant locomotor–respiratory coupling (1:4 at BrP2 compared to 1:3 at BrP1 and BrP2) and RPE (10.27 ± 2.00 at BrP1 compared to 11.95 ± 1.79 at BrP1 and 11.95 ± 1.01 at BrP3) but not any other respiratory, metabolic or hemodynamic measures of the healthy adults during moderate cycling. The ventilatory efficiency was shown to improve upon dominant locomotor–respiratory coupling, regardless of BrP (eqO$_2$ = 21.8 ± 2.2 and eqCO$_2$ = 24.0 ± 1.9), compared to the other entrainment coupling regimes (25.3 ± 1.9, 27.3 ± 1.7) and no entrainment (24.8 ± 1.5, 26.5 ± 1.3), respectively. No interaction between phonated breathing and entrainment was observed during moderate cycling. We showed, for the first time, that phonation can be used as a simple tool to manipulate expiratory flow. Furthermore, our results indicated that in young healthy adults, entrainment, rather than expiratory resistance, preferentially affected ergogenic enhancement upon moderate stationary cycling. It can only be speculated that phonation would be a good strategy to increase exercise tolerance among COPD patients or to boost the respiratory efficiency of healthy people at higher exercise loads.

Language:English
Keywords:locomotor-respiratory coupling, phonation, increased expiratory pressure, ventilatory efficiency, peak expiratory flow
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:14 str.
Numbering:Vol. 20, iss. 4, art. 2838
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-154102 This link opens in a new window
UDC:612
ISSN on article:1660-4601
DOI:10.3390/ijerph20042838 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:143980803 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:25.01.2024
Views:548
Downloads:19
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:International journal of environmental research and public health
Shortened title:Int. j. environ. res. public health
Publisher:MDPI
ISSN:1660-4601
COBISS.SI-ID:1818965 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:lokomotorno-respiratorna sklopka, fonacija, povečan ekspiracijski tlak, učinkovitost ventiliranja, najvišji pretok pri izdihu

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P3-0019
Name:Aplikativna in bazična fiziologija in patofiziologija v medicini

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back