izpis_h1_title_alt

Evaluating country performance after transitioning from Gavi assistance : an applied synthetic control analysis
ID Kolesar, Robert John (Author), ID Spruk, Rok (Author), ID Tsheten, Tsheten (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,21 MB)
MD5: CF5123EC2372BDD6AD45912422BA2860
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.ghspjournal.org/content/11/4/e2200536 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Introduction: Over the past decade, international development assistance for health has slowed. As donors seek to increase domestic cofinancing and ultimately transition countries from donor aid dependence, COVID-19 has severely constrained public budgets. The evaluation of sustainability and longer-term impacts of donor withdrawal is increasingly important. We assess vaccination coverage and post-neonatal mortality to estimate country performance of these outcomes among countries that no longer received assistance from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (Gavi) between 2000 and 2018. Methods: Using data from all countries receiving Gavi support between 2000 and 2020, we employed a synthetic control method to generate a pre-transition counterfactual with the same characteristics as the observation of interest to predict a future that empirically never existed. The synthetic unit is constructed from the weighted average of other units with good fit to the unit of interest before transition but did not transition. Results: We found substantial heterogeneity after transitioning from Gavi assistance. China, Guyana, and Turkmenistan overperformed their expected coverage rates; Albania, Bhutan, China, Guyana, and Turkmenistan maintained coverage over 90%; and Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ukraine reported precipitous drop-offs that fell well below their synthetic controls. We also observed a vaccination coverage decline in 2020 for several countries after transitioning and most synthetic controls, which we attribute to COVID-19- related service disruptions. Conclusions: We recommend that Gavi adjust its transition model to systematically assess contextual externalities and risk. In addition, countries that no longer receive Gavi assistance can leverage technical assistance and communities of practice to mutually assist each other and other countries advancing toward transition. This could also foster intracountry accountability after transition. We also recommend that Gavi systematize post-transition assessments and evaluations that leverage the expertise and experience of graduated countries to encourage cross-learning.

Language:English
Keywords:developing countries, health care, pandemic, development aid
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:EF - School of Economics and Business
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:14 str.
Numbering:Vol. 11, iss. 4
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-154017 This link opens in a new window
UDC:614
ISSN on article:2169-575X
DOI:10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00536 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:161716739 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:19.01.2024
Views:161
Downloads:18
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Global health. science and practice
Shortened title:Glob. health sci. pract.
Publisher:U.S. Agency for International Development and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs
ISSN:2169-575X
COBISS.SI-ID:524568345 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:dežele v razvoju, zdravstveno varstvo, pandemija, razvojna pomoč

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back