izpis_h1_title_alt

When to conduct student evaluation of teaching surveys : before or after the final examination?
ID Vehovar, Vasja (Author), ID Štrlekar, Luka (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,21 MB)
MD5: 65FBE1B63915792007994FC9B80203B0
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2023.2298771 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Student evaluation of teaching (SET) involves numerous conceptual and methodological problems. This paper focuses on a specific methodological dilemma: whether to conduct SET surveys before or after the final examination. This decision is a critical administrative and practical issue that can affect the level and quality of SET results. To address this problem, a systematic literature search was initially performed. However, it found only 17 studies and inconclusive results. In the empirical component, a replication survey (n = 5,077) was conducted. It posed seven course-related questions to the same students before and after their final examination. A slightly higher but statistically significant (p < 0.001) average score was obtained in the after-examination survey (a 0.06 difference on a 1–5 scale). This increase was partly attributed to a positive examination experience. The overall test–retest correlation (r = 0.61) indicated relatively low reliability, suggesting that the before-examination survey better reflected students’ attitudes. The data quality was also higher in the before-examination survey, although the before-examination survey could not properly assess the examination-related aspects of the course. From a methodological perspective, the most comprehensive insight seems to be derived from conducting SET surveys before the examination and following up with a brief after-examination survey.

Language:English
Keywords:student evaluation of teaching, administration, timing, cross-classified multilevel models
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:In print
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 1-14
Numbering:Vol. , no.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-153493 This link opens in a new window
UDC:378
ISSN on article:0260-2938
DOI:10.1080/02602938.2023.2298771 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:179231747 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:10.01.2024
Views:179
Downloads:15
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Assessment and evaluation in higher education
Shortened title:Assess. eval. high. educ.
Publisher:Taylor&Francis
ISSN:0260-2938
COBISS.SI-ID:16511581 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:študenti, ankete

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Funding programme:Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Project number:P5-0399
Name:Internetno raziskovanje

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Funding programme:Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Project number:J5-9334
Name:Uporaba parapodatkov za ocenjevanje kakovosti odgovorov v anketah

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Funding programme:Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Project number:J5-3100
Name:Ovrednotenje verjetnostnih in neverjetnostnih spletnih panelov

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back