Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
When to conduct student evaluation of teaching surveys : before or after the final examination?
ID
Vehovar, Vasja
(
Author
),
ID
Štrlekar, Luka
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,09 MB)
MD5: 082D2A6A8998E3544FD6949848395440
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2023.2298771
Image galllery
Abstract
Student evaluation of teaching (SET) involves numerous conceptual and methodological problems. This paper focuses on a specific methodological dilemma: whether to conduct SET surveys before or after the final examination. This decision is a critical administrative and practical issue that can affect the level and quality of SET results. To address this problem, a systematic literature search was initially performed. However, it found only 17 studies and inconclusive results. In the empirical component, a replication survey (n = 5,077) was conducted. It posed seven course-related questions to the same students before and after their final examination. A slightly higher but statistically significant (p < 0.001) average score was obtained in the after-examination survey (a 0.06 difference on a 1–5 scale). This increase was partly attributed to a positive examination experience. The overall test–retest correlation (r = 0.61) indicated relatively low reliability, suggesting that the before-examination survey better reflected students’ attitudes. The data quality was also higher in the before-examination survey, although the before-examination survey could not properly assess the examination-related aspects of the course. From a methodological perspective, the most comprehensive insight seems to be derived from conducting SET surveys before the examination and following up with a brief after-examination survey.
Language:
English
Keywords:
student evaluation of teaching
,
administration
,
timing
,
cross-classified multilevel models
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2024
Number of pages:
Str. 767–780
Numbering:
Vol. 49, no. 6
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-153493
UDC:
378
ISSN on article:
0260-2938
DOI:
10.1080/02602938.2023.2298771
COBISS.SI-ID:
179231747
Publication date in RUL:
10.01.2024
Views:
474
Downloads:
75
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Assessment and evaluation in higher education
Shortened title:
Assess. eval. high. educ.
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
ISSN:
0260-2938
COBISS.SI-ID:
16511581
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
študenti
,
ankete
Projects
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
P5-0399
Name:
Internetno raziskovanje
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
J5-9334
Name:
Uporaba parapodatkov za ocenjevanje kakovosti odgovorov v anketah
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
J5-3100
Name:
Ovrednotenje verjetnostnih in neverjetnostnih spletnih panelov
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back