Details

Procedural challenges of cross-border cooperation and consistency in personal data protection in the EU
ID Rudolf, Grega (Author), ID Kovač, Polonca (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (5,98 MB)
MD5: 53ACC73513EA96797F127555CFCEF596
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/nispa-2023-0017 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Data protection is an increasingly important topic in the European administrative field at national and cross-border levels. Such a trend reflects different phenomena in contemporary society, which further leads to a more focused concern for a harmonised elaboration by the Member States despite their autonomy, in principle, regarding EU law implementation. However, as revealed by the Slovenian case in this article, the European Data Protection Board and national supervising authorities, mostly information commissioners, express the need to regulate some issues more decidedly. Interestingly, yet not surprisingly, their focus is on procedural aspects, as according to administrative science and several European Commission documents, procedure strongly influences the results. As a result, the article elaborates on the relevant procedural issues to be addressed to ensure a harmonised enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in force since 2018. Various research methods are employed, combining qualitative, normative, and comparative analyses and quantitative approaches, emphasising statistical data obtained from annual reports for 2020, 2021, and 2022. The results show a lack of procedural provisions in several aspects, including the definition of the parties to the procedure and their defence rights, particularly access to the file, to be heard, and complain, as well as one-stop-shop access to legal protection, deadlines, and investigation powers. Such gaps are expected to be covered by procedural institutions enshrined in National Administrative Procedure Acts (APA). However, as suggested by the Slovenian experience, such a solution is minimal due to differing national regulations and relatively low awareness of APA relevance in data protection even among supervising authorities. Hence, the authors argue that there is a need to develop and adopt standard EU rules to regulate such issues.

Language:English
Keywords:administrative procedural law, cross-border cooperation and enforcement, EU law and national autonomy, GDPR, personal data protection
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 143-170
Numbering:Vol. 16, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-153412 This link opens in a new window
UDC:342(4-6EU):004.6-027.552
ISSN on article:1338-4309
DOI:10.2478/nispa-2023-0017 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:179459331 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:04.01.2024
Views:4290
Downloads:248
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy
Shortened title:NISPAcee j. publi. adm. policy
Publisher:NISPAcee
ISSN:1338-4309
COBISS.SI-ID:520037913 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:upravno procesno pravo, čezmejno sodelovanje in izvrševanje, pravo Evropske unije in nacionalna avtomonija, GDPR, varstvo osebnih podatkov

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P5-0093
Name:Razvoj sistema učinkovite in uspešne javne uprave

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back