The use of hemp (Cannabis Sativa) has attracted much interest due to its versatile applications in the pharmaceutical, nutritional, cosmetic and textile industries. The focus is on cannabinoids, bioactive compounds that are characteristic of hemp and have a wide range of biological effects. To obtain high-quality, biologically active extracts, efficacious extraction methods are crucial.
The aim of this master's thesis was to investigate subcritical water extraction as a method for obtaining hemp extracts and to compare them with extracts obtained by other established methods such as supercritical CO2 extraction, ultrasonic extraction with organic solvents and water, and Soxhlet extraction. The extraction yield was determined gravimetrically. Spectrophotometric methods were used to analyze the antioxidant activity of the extracts and the total amount of polyphenols. HPLC was used to determine the quantity of individual cannabinoids in the extracts. In addition, the essential oil and the condensed aqueous phase of the distillation were obtained by Clevenger distillation, and their compositions were analyzed and compared using GC-MS.
It was found that the extracts differed considerably in the studied properties. The highest extraction yield was obtained with subcritical water extraction (35,91%), and temperature and the drug to solvent ratio were the main parameters affecting the yield. Subcritical water extraction did not prove to be a suitable method for the extraction of cannabinoids. Similarly, we could not establish a correlation between extraction parameters and cannabinoid content. For this purpose, Soxhlet extraction (36.06% CBG) and high-pressure ethanol extraction (17.39% CBGA) proved to be the most suitable. Subcritical water extraction yielded extracts with comparable high antioxidant activity and polyphenol content to extracts obtained by other methods. Temperature appeared as a key parameter and showed a strong positive correlation with antioxidant activity and polyphenol content. Essential oil and condensed Clevenger water fraction were found to be significantly different, the former containing predominantly sesquiterpenes (82.51%) and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (9.12%), while the latter was rich in oxygenated monoterpenes (34.97%) and non-terpene compounds with carbonyl groups (45.16%).
|