Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Towards multi-model soil erosion modelling : an evaluation of the Erosion Potential Method (EPM) for global soil erosion assessments
ID
Bezak, Nejc
(
Author
),
ID
Borrelli, Pasquale
(
Author
),
ID
Mikoš, Matjaž
(
Author
),
ID
Jemec Auflič, Mateja
(
Author
),
ID
Panagos, Panos
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(5,02 MB)
MD5: CAF5EDE31A4ECD4BB0AF64A5A87D7BAB
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816223006872
Image galllery
Abstract
Soil erosion is expected to increase in the future due to climate change. Soil erosion models are useful tools that can be used by decision makers and other stakeholders to deal with soil erosion problems or the implementation of soil protection measures. Most of the modelling applications are using Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE)-type models. In this study, we evaluate the applicability of the Erosion Potential Model (EPM) and its modified version (mEPM) for the estimation of the gross and net erosion rates at a global scale. The sensitivity analysis shows that the model results have the highest variability due to the soil protection (land cover) coefficient followed by the soil erodibility parameter. The models’ evaluations indicate that that the EPM cannot be applied to cold regions while the mEPM overcomes this issue. The erosion rates based on the EPM were 1.5–2.5 times larger than the ones obtained from the mEPM. Increasing the number of catchment properties as inputs to the model may help in improving the performance of the tested EPM and mEPM. Moreover, a comparison of net soil losses by mEPM with long-term suspended sediment yield data for 116 catchments located around the globe indicates a median bias of less than 10%, although the bias for around 1/3 of catchments was above 100%. Furthermore, a direct comparison with other soil erosion models such as USLE-type models is not possible since the EPM and mEPM do take into consideration other processes such as soil slumps and gully erosion and not just sheet and rill erosion. Therefore, as expected, the gross erosion rates by the EPM and mEPM are higher compared to the USLE-type models. Hence, the mEPM, despite its limitations, could be regarded as an interesting approach for the describing erosion processes around the globe and should be further tested using small- and medium-sized catchments from various climate zones.
Language:
English
Keywords:
global assessment
,
Erosion Potential Model
,
EPM
,
soil erosion
,
modified Erosion Potential Model
,
mEPM
,
sediment yield
,
model evaluation
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2024
Number of pages:
12 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 234, art. 107596
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-151971
UDC:
504.12:551.311.21
ISSN on article:
0341-8162
DOI:
10.1016/j.catena.2023.107596
COBISS.SI-ID:
168494083
Publication date in RUL:
26.10.2023
Views:
502
Downloads:
69
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Catena : an interdisciplinary journal of soil science - hydrology- geomorphology focusing on geoecology and landscape evolution
Shortened title:
Catena
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
0341-8162
COBISS.SI-ID:
25199104
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
globalna ocena
,
Gavrilovićeva metoda
,
erozija tal
,
prilagojena Gavrilovićeva metoda
,
dotok sedimentov
,
vrednotenje modela
Projects
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
J6-4628
Name:
Vrednotenje hibridne infrastrukture za zmanjševanje ogroženosti pod vplivom podnebnih sprememb
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
N2-0313
Name:
Lokalni vplivi na površinski odtok
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
J1-2477
Name:
Erozijski procesi na obalnih flišnih klifih z oceno tveganja
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
J1-3024
Name:
Dešifriranje občutljivosti skalnih sten na podnebne spremembe in cikle zmrzovanja in odtaljevanja na območjih brez permafrosta
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
P2-0180
Name:
Vodarstvo in geotehnika: orodja in metode za analize in simulacije procesov ter razvoj tehnologij
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
UNESCO Chair on Water-related Disaster Risk Reduction
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back