izpis_h1_title_alt

Privilegij zoper samoobtožbo v povezavi z dokazi s področja nevroznanosti : magistrsko diplomsko delo
ID Jasenc Lenček, Nina (Author), ID Hafner, Miha (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (557,99 KB)
MD5: 65BDAC4E08741FB216A6E1A469C1CEA5

Abstract
Nevroznanost je naravoslovna veda, ki preučuje različne vidike delovanja možganov, kot so kognicija, vedenje in čustva, ter kako so ti povezani s strukturo in aktivnostjo možganov. V zadnjih nekaj desetletjih se nevroznanost bolj izrazito prepleta tudi s kazenskim pravom, njena implementacija v kazenski postopek pa odpira pomembna vprašanja glede dometa privilegija zoper samoobtožbo, ki je v demokratičnih državah široko priznan kot eden izmed temeljev poštenega kazenskega postopka. Med pravnimi ureditvami po svetu ni jasnega konsenza glede tega, ali dokaze, pridobljene s pomočjo sodobnih metod preučevanja možganov, kategoriziramo kot telesni ali testimonialni dokaz in ali so tovrstni dokazi sploh dopustni. Njihova morebitna uporaba v kazenskem postopku zahteva premišljeno obravnavo in uravnotežen pristop, da se zagotovi spoštovanje pravic posameznikov v kazenskem postopku.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:privilegij zoper samoobtožbo, nevroznanost, kazenski postopek, možgansko slikanje, testimonialni dokaz
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:N. Jasenc Lenček
Year:2023
Number of pages:II, 47 f.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-151609 This link opens in a new window
UDC:343.131(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:170235395 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:12.10.2023
Views:694
Downloads:84
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Relation to Neuroscience-related Evidence
Abstract:
Neuroscience is a natural science that studies various aspects of brain function, such as cognition, behaviour, and emotions, and how these are related to the structure and activity of the brain. In recent decades, neuroscience has become increasingly intertwined with criminal law. Its implementation in the criminal procedure raises important questions regarding the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination, which is widely recognised in democratic states as one of the cornerstones of a fair criminal procedure. There is no clear consensus among jurisdictions worldwide on whether evidence obtained through modern methods of brain investigation should be categorized as physical or testimonial evidence, and whether such evidence is admissible at all. The potential use of such evidence in criminal procedure requires careful consideration and a balanced approach to ensure the respect for individuals' rights in the criminal procedure.

Keywords:privilege against self-incrimination, neuroscience, criminal procedure, brain imaging, testimonial evidence

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back