izpis_h1_title_alt

Razširjenost trajnih tetovaž med študenti Fakultete za farmacijo in njihovo poznavanje neželenih učinkov tetoviranja
ID Špindler, Žana (Author), ID Gašperlin, Mirjana (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,01 MB)
MD5: 0E5A5EF3849D61871E9F7D2673D2463B

Abstract
Tetovaže oz. permanentne oznake ali dizajni so, tako v starodavnih civilizacijah, kot tudi sodobnih subkulturah, odigrale pomembno vlogo. V preteklosti so bile del raznolikih obredov in hkrati predstavljale zaščito ter znak predanosti ali pripadnosti, danes pa je njihov pomen bolj estetske narave, poleg tega pa omogočajo pripovedovanje zgodbe vsakega posameznika na lastni koži. Tekom let se je nadgrajevala tudi regulativa na področju tetovaž. Z namenom zaščite uporabnikov je Evropska komisija sklenila, da bo v prihodnosti omejila uporabo za človeka potencialno nevarnih kemikalij. Kljub vsem omejitvam in priporočilom, pa lahko po tetoviranju še vedno pride do neželenih učinkov, npr. okužb z virusi hepatitisa B, hepatitisa C, HIV in/ali Herpes simplex, vnetnih reakcij, vulgarnega ekcema, urtikarije ter hiperpigmentiranih/hipopigmentiranih lis. Da bi raziskali razširjenost trajnih tetovaž med študenti Fakultete za farmacijo Univerze v Ljubljani, in preverili njihovo poznavanje neželenih učinkov tetoviranja, smo pripravili anonimni anketni vprašalnik v programu 1KA, s pomočjo katerega smo pridobili sociodemografske podatke ter informacije o prisotnosti, številu, položaju in barvi trajnih tetovaž, kje so tetovažo naredili in, kaj je vplivalo na njihovo odločitev, poznavanju in prisotnosti trajnih učinkov ter razlogih, zakaj bi se za tetoviranje odločili ponovno ali ne. Na anketo je odgovorilo 250 študentov Fakultete za farmacijo. Med vsemi, ki so odgovorili na anketo, je 30 % tetoviranih. Najbolj pogosta barva tetovaž je črna, ki jo ima 75 od 76 anketirancev tetovirancev. Večina, kar 86 % tetoviranih študentov, se je tetovirala v ustrezno registriranem studiu. Neželene učinke sta imela 2 od 76 anketirancev, in sicer eden alergijo na sestavino barvila, drugi pa srbečico, vnetje, oteklino in mehurje. Med anketiranimi se jih 210 oz. 84 % študentov Fakultete za farmacijo zaveda zaveda, da po tetoviranju lahko pride do neželenih učinkov. Med ne-tetoviranimi osebami je skoraj 20 % takih, ki se ne zavedajo neželenih učinkov tetovaž, medtem ko je v skupini tetoviranih anketirancev samo 6,5 %. Devetdestet % anketirancev, ki se zavedajo, da po tetoviranju lahko pride do neželenih učinkov, je kot neželeni učinek tega posega prepoznalo vnetne reakcije, največkrat pojav granulomov zaradi tujkov. Sledijo: hiperpigmentirane ali hipopigmentirane kožne lise, ki jih je prepoznalo 53 % anketirancev, hepatitis C (50 %), in hepatitis B (47 %). Anketirani so v manjši meri prepoznali tudi koprivnico oz. urtikarijo (28 %), vulgarni ekcem (24 %), najmanj pa okužbo z virusom Herpes simplex (17 %).

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:tetovaža, barve za tetoviranje, neželeni učinki tetoviranja
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FFA - Faculty of Pharmacy
Year:2023
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-148703 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:30.08.2023
Views:512
Downloads:163
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Prevalence of permanent tattoos among students of the Faculty of Pharmacy and their knowledge of the adverse effects of tattooing
Abstract:
Tattoos, also known as permanent markings or designs, have played a significant role in both ancient civilizations and modern subcultures. In the past, they were part of diverse rituals and represented protection, commitment, or affiliation. Today, their meaning is more of an aesthetic nature, and they allow individuals to tell their own stories on their skin. Over the years, regulations regarding tattoos have also evolved. With the aim of protecting users, the European Commission has decided to limit the use of potentially hazardous chemicals for human application. Despite all the restrictions and recommendations, there can still be unwanted effects after tattooing, such as infections with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, and/or Herpes simplex viruses, inflammatory reactions, vulgar eczema, urticaria, and hyperpigmented/hypopigmented spots. To explore the prevalence of permanent tattoos among students of the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Ljubljana and assess their knowledge of the adverse effects of tattooing, we designed an anonymous questionnaire using the 1KA platform. Through this survey, we collected sociodemographic data and information about the presence, number, location, and color of permanent tattoos, where they were obtained, factors influencing their decisions, awareness, and presence of lasting effects, as well as reasons for reconsidering tattooing. A total of 250 students from the Faculty of Pharmacy responded to the survey, of whom 30% reported having tattoos. The most common tattoo color is black, with 75 out of 76 tattooed respondents having it. The majority, 86% of tattooed students, got their tattoos at appropriately registered studios. Two out of 76 respondents experienced adverse effects, one having an allergy to a coloring ingredient, and the other experiencing itching, inflammation, swelling, and blisters. Among the surveyed students, 210 or 84% of those from the Faculty of Pharmacy are aware that adverse effects can occur after tattooing. Among the non-tattooed individuals, almost 20% were unaware of the potential adverse effects of tattoos, while among the tattooed respondents, only 6.5% were unaware. Ninety percent of those who are aware of the potential adverse effects recognized inflammatory reactions as a common side effect, often appearing as granulomas due to foreign bodies. Other recognized effects include hyperpigmented or hypopigmented skin spots, identified by 53% of respondents, hepatitis C (50%), and hepatitis B (47%). There was also a lesser recognition of hives or urticaria (28%) and vulgar eczema (24%), and the least recognition of Herpes simplex virus infection (17%).

Keywords:tattoo, tattoo colors, adverse effects of tattooing.

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back