Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Technology in scientific practice : how H. J. Muller used the fruit fly to investigate the X-ray machine
ID
Komel, Svit
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,59 MB)
MD5: 153034BBCF5CBE4997B093CB27E89EC6
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40656-023-00572-9
Image galllery
Abstract
Since the practice turn, the role technologies play in the production of scientific knowledge has become a prominent topic in science studies. Much existing scholarship, however, either limits technology to merely mechanical instrumentation or uses the term for a wide variety of items. This article argues that technologies in scientific practice can be understood as a result of past scientific knowledge becoming sedimented in materials, like model organisms, synthetic reagents or mechanical instruments, through the routine use of these materials in subsequent research practice. The proposed theoretical interpretation of technology is examined through a case where a model organism—Drosophila melanogaster—acted as a technology for investigating a contested biological effect of a mechanical instrument: Hermann J. Muller’s experiments on X-ray mutagenicity in the 1920s. The article reconstructs how Muller employed two synthetic Drosophila stocks as tests for measuring X-rays’ capacity to cause genetic aberration. It argues that past scientific knowledge sedimented in the Drosophila stocks influenced Muller’s perception of X-ray-induced mutation. It further describes how Muller’s concept of X-ray mutagenicity sedimented through the adoption of X-ray machines as a ready-made resource for producing mutants by other geneticists, for instance George Beadle and Edward Tatum in their experiments on Neurospora crassa, despite ongoing disputes surrounding Muller’s conclusions. Technological sedimentation is proposed as a potential explanation why sedimentation and disputation may often coexist in the history of science.
Language:
English
Keywords:
technology
,
sedimentation
,
model organisms
,
instruments
,
Hermann J. Muller
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
PF - Faculty of Law
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2023
Number of pages:
34 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 45, iss. 2, art. 22
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-148128
UDC:
3
ISSN on article:
1742-6316
DOI:
10.1007/s40656-023-00572-9
COBISS.SI-ID:
154740227
Publication date in RUL:
27.07.2023
Views:
350
Downloads:
65
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
History and philosophy of the life sciences
Shortened title:
Hist. philos. life sci.
Publisher:
Springer Nature, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn
ISSN:
1742-6316
COBISS.SI-ID:
527287321
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back