izpis_h1_title_alt

Where are we now with European forest multi-taxon biodiversity and where can we head to?
ID Burrascano, Sabina (Author), ID Chianucci, Francesco (Author), ID Trentanovi, Giovanni (Author), ID Kepfer-Rojas, Sebastian (Author), ID Sitzia, Tommaso (Author), ID Tinya, Flóra (Author), ID Doerfler, Inken (Author), ID Paillet, Yoan (Author), ID Nagel, Thomas Andrew (Author), ID Mitić, Božena (Author), et al.

URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072300277X?via%3Dihub This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (7,21 MB)
MD5: 36024E546F824A3038A2A84F39647D44

Abstract
The European biodiversity and forest strategies rely on forest sustainable management (SFM) to conserve forest biodiversity. However, current sustainability assessments hardly account for direct biodiversity indicators. We focused on forest multi-taxon biodiversity to: i) gather and map the existing information; ii) identify knowledge and research gaps; iii) discuss its research potential. We established a research network to fit data on species, standing trees, lying deadwood and sampling unit description from 34 local datasets across 3591 sampling units. A total of 8724 species were represented, with the share of common and rare species varying across taxonomic classes: some included many species with several rare ones (e.g., Insecta); others (e.g., Bryopsida) were represented by few common species. Tree-related structural attributes were sampled in a subset of sampling units (2889; 2356; 2309 and 1388 respectively for diameter, height, deadwood and microhabitats). Overall, multi-taxon studies are biased towards mature forests and may underrepresent the species related to other developmental phases. European forest compositional categories were all represented, but beech forests were over-represented as compared to thermophilous and boreal forests. Most sampling units (94%) were referred to a habitat type of conservation concern. Existing information may support European conservation and SFM strategies in: (i) methodological harmonization and coordinated monitoring; (ii) definition and testing of SFM indicators and thresholds; (iii) data-driven assessment of the effects of environmental and management drivers on multi-taxon forest biological and functional diversity, (iv) multi-scale forest monitoring integrating in-situ and remotely sensed information.

Language:English
Keywords:forest biodiversity, multi-taxon, sustainable management, biodiversity conservation, forest stand structure
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2023
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 1-13
Numbering:Vol. 284, article no. ǂ110176
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-147368 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*2
ISSN on article:1873-2917
DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110176 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:157474051 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:03.07.2023
Views:198
Downloads:43
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Biological conservation
Publisher:Elsevier Ltd.
ISSN:1873-2917
COBISS.SI-ID:93587459 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:gozdna biotska raznovrstnost, trajnostno gospodarjenje, ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, struktura gozdnih sestojev

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back