Introduction: Cerebral palsy is an umbrella term for a group of developmental disorders, characterized by disturbances of movement and posture, can also of cognition, communication and feeding. It is the most commmon consequence of the malformation of body structures in children and is the result of non-progressive damage or damage to the developing brain. The frequency of cerebral palsy ranges from 1.5 to 3 per 1000 live births. The World Health Organization defines quality of life as an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value system in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns. There are several factors that affect in the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy and these are: physical disability of the child, stress, socioeconomic status of the family, social inclusion and other environmental factors. Purpose: We aimed to investigate connection between cerebral palsy and quality of life and how children with cerebral palsy level I as well as their parents evaluate the quality of life according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Methods: A quantitative methodological approach was used. In this research we used the evaluation instrument »Assessment of the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy«, translated into Slovene. The observation and research was conducted with the help of 10 childen aged 9 to 12 with Gross Motor Function Classification System level I and their 8 parents, who were included in the rehabilitation program at the University Rehabilitation Institute of the Republic of Slovenia Soča with the children. Results: Children with Gross Motor Function Classification System level I and their parents rated their quality of life as good. The children’s ratings ranged from 53,1% to 79%, and with their parents the ratings ranged from 54% to 83,5%. Five out of eight parents rated their child’s quality of life higher than the child himself. Discussion and conclusion: Children with cerebral palsy have a good quality of life, and so do their parents. Further research with evaluation instrument should include a wider sample of participants.
|