izpis_h1_title_alt

Timsko poučevanje izvajalcev dodatne strokovne pomoči in učiteljev predmetnega pouka in njegov vpliv na socialno vključenost učencev s primanjkljaji na posameznih področjih učenja : magistrsko delo
ID Hršak, Katarina Kaja (Author), ID Košak Babuder, Milena (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,23 MB)
MD5: B4BD163DF203162CA9E02572D9DE5C9F

Abstract
Timsko poučevanje med predmetnim učiteljem in izvajalcem dodatne strokovne pomoči (v nadaljevanju DSP) je eden od pomembnih dejavnikov zadovoljevanja potreb učencev s primanjkljaji na posameznih področjih učenja (v nadaljevanju PPPU), ki so vključeni v program s prilagojenim izvajanjem in DSP. V slovenskih šolah se DSP večinoma izvaja izven razreda, kar ni v skladu z inkluzivnimi smernicami. Bolj pogosto je sodelovanje med razrednim učiteljem in učiteljem DSP kot med predmetnim učiteljem in učiteljem DSP. V šolskem letu 2022/23 je bilo kar 78 % vseh učencev s PPPU vključenih v 6.–9. razred, kjer pouk v večini izvajajo predmetni učitelji. Zahtevnost učnih vsebin se v višjih razredih redne osnovne šole hitro stopnjuje, učenci s PPPU poleg obravnave nove učne vsebine v razredu potrebujejo tudi dodaten prilagojen trening, material in podporo. Podporo potrebujejo tudi učitelji, ki poučujejo učence s PPPU, zato je sodelovanje med učiteljem DSP in predmetnim učiteljem nujno potrebno. Ena izmed možnih oblik sodelovanja je timsko poučevanje, pri katerem izvajalec DSP in predmetni učitelj sodelujeta v vseh fazah timskega dela z istim ciljem, pri sami izvedbi pa imata lahko različno aktivne vloge. S takšnim pristopom pridobi učenec s PPPU tako z izobraževalnega vidika, saj je lahko deležen obravnave nove učne vsebine s strani učitelja, ki je strokovnjak za določeno predmetno področje, in hkrati specifičnih prilagoditev, potrebnih za njegov učni proces, ki mu jih ponudi izvajalec DSP, kot tudi z vidika socialne vključenosti, saj med uro DSP ni izključen iz razreda. Pridobijo pa tudi ostali učenci, ki so lahko deležni dodatnega učitelja v razredu, kot tudi oba strokovna delavca, ki svoja znanja in izkušnje delita in ob izmenjavi strokovno rasteta. V magistrskem delu smo s kvantitativno raziskavo preverili, kako timsko poučevanje v slovenskih osnovnih šolah dojemajo predmetni učitelji in izvajalci DSP, kako kompetentne se počutijo za izvajanje, kako pogosto uporabljajo posamezne pristope timskega poučevanja ter kakšen vpliv timskega poučevanja prepoznavajo na socialno vključenost učencev s PPPU. S kvalitativno raziskavo smo želeli ugotoviti, kakšna stališča imajo izvajalci DSP in predmetni učitelji o timskem poučevanju pred in po izkušnji timskega poučevanja ter kako timsko poučevanje dojemajo učenci s PPPU in njihovi vrstniki. Rezultati so pokazali, da večina anketiranih meni, da je timsko poučevanje potrebno za vse skupine učencev s PPPU, da pozitivno vpliva na socialno vključenost teh učencev ter se za izvedbo počutijo kompetentne, hkrati pa večina anketiranih nikoli oz. redko pri poučevanju teh učencev uporablja pristope timskega poučevanja. Anketirani v največjem deležu prepoznavajo učinkovitejše nudenje strokovne pomoči in podpore ter sprotno izmenjavo povratnih informacij o delu z učenci s PPPU kot prednosti, pomanjkanje časa za načrtovanje pa kot oviro za timsko poučevanje. Osebna izkušnja timskega poučevanja pomembno pozitivno vpliva na stališča, povezana s timskim poučevanjem, predvsem na stališče, da timsko poučevanje predmetnega učitelja in izvajalca DSP poveča učno motivacijo učencev s PPPU. Tako učenci s PPPU kot ostali učenci, deležni timskega poučevanja, izpostavljajo več prednosti kot pomanjkljivosti ne glede na pristop timskega poučevanja, ki so ga bili deležni, najpogosteje učinkovito podporo, zanimive dejavnosti in učinkovitejšo razlago.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:timsko poučevanje, izvajalci dodatne strokovne pomoči, predmetni učitelji, učenci s primanjkljaji na posameznih področjih učenja, socialna vključenost
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[K.K. Hršak
Year:2023
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (176 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-146754 This link opens in a new window
UDC:37.091.312(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:155377411 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.06.2023
Views:1292
Downloads:755
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Team Teaching of Additional Professional Support Providers and Subject Teachers, and its Impact on Social Inclusion of Students with Severe Specific Learning Difficulties
Abstract:
Team teaching between the subject teacher and the additional professional support provider is one of the most important factors in meeting the needs of students with severe specific learning difficulties (SpLD) who are included in program with adapted implementation and additional professional support. In Slovenian schools, additional professional support is mostly provided outside the classroom, which is not in line with the inclusive guidelines. Cooperation between the class teacher and the additional professional support provider is more frequent than between the subject teacher and the additional professional support provider. In the school year 2022/23, as many as 78 % of all students with severe SpLD were in the grades 6th–9th, where instruction is predominantly provided by subject teachers. The level of difficulty of the learning content increases rapidly in the upper grades of primary schools, and students with severe SpLD need additional tailored training, materials and support in addition to mastering new learning content in the classroom. Teachers who teach students with severe SpLD also need support, so collaboration between the additional professional support provider and the subject teacher is essential. One of the possible forms of collaboration is team teaching, where the additional professional support provider and the subject teacher participate in all phases of teamwork with the same goal, but can take different active roles in the implementation itself. In such an approach, the student with severe SPLD benefits both from a pedagogical point of view, as he/she is taught new learning content by a subject teacher who is an expert in a specific field, and from specific adaptations necessary for his/her learning process offered by the additional professional support provider, and from a social inclusion point of view, as he/she is not excluded from the class during the hour of additional professional support. The other students also benefit from having an additional teacher in the class as well as from the two professionals sharing their knowledge and experience and growing professionally during the exchange. In the Master's thesis, we used quantitative research to investigate how team teaching in Slovenian primary schools is perceived by subject teachers and additional professional support providers, how competent they feel in implementing it, how often they use individual team teaching approaches and what impact they perceive on the social inclusion of students with severe SpLD. Using qualitative research, we wanted to find out what attitudes additional professional support providers and subject teachers have towards team teaching before and after the experience of team teaching and how team teaching is perceived by students with severe SpLD and their peers. Empirical research has shown that the majority of respondents believe that team teaching is necessary for all groups of students with severe SpLD, that it has a positive impact on the social inclusion of these students and that they feel competent to implement team teaching, but at the same time the majority of respondents never or rarely use team teaching approaches to teach these students. The majority of respondents see the more effective provision of professional help and support and the continuous sharing of feedback on working with students with severe SpLD as an advantage, while the lack of time for planning as a barrier to team teaching. Personal experience with team teaching has a significant positive effect on attitudes towards team teaching, especially the attitude that team teaching of the subject teacher and additional professional support increases the learning motivation of students with severe SpLD. Both students with severe SpLD and other students who are team-teached highlight more advantages than disadvantages, regardless of the type of team teaching they received, most often effective support, interesting activities and more effective explanations.

Keywords:team teaching, additional professional support providers, subject teachers, students with severe specific learning difficulties, social inclusion

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back