izpis_h1_title_alt

Tiskovna prehodnost pri ofsetnem tisku in elektrofotografiji
ID Krpan, Nina (Author), ID Muck, Deja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,06 MB)
MD5: A4D8C79CFCE1C6BFCBBB6ABF5E05329D

Abstract
Tehnike tiska se delijo na analogne in digitalne. Pod analogne se uvršča najpogosteje uporabljen ofsetni tisk, pod digitalne pa elektrofotografija. Ti dve tehniki sta zelo razširjeni glede na uporabo. V teoretičnem delu diplomskega dela sta opisani obe tehniki tiska, njuni tiskovni formi in postopek tiskanja. V eksperimentalnem delu je opisano, kako poteka izdelava testne forme v programu Adobe InDesign in kaj vsebuje. Dodane so meritve, izmerjene s spektrodenzitometrom, ki so bile razdeljene na tri dele, in sicer na meritve D barve, meritve rastrske tonske vrednosti (A) in spektrofotometrične meritve z meritvami L*a*b* vrednosti. Meritve so prikazane tudi grafično, za različne tehnike in različne papirje. Eksperimentalni del je zasnovan na tiskanju iste testne forme na premazan papir gramature 170 in 80 g ter nepremazan papir gramature 170 in 80 g. Po meritvah so prikazani še slikovni izrezi različnih napak pri tisku in klinov, ki so uporabljeni za primerjavo pri vizualni analizi. Namen primerjanja teh štirih različnih odtisov je preko meritev potrditi, katera tehnika tiska na kateri papir je najbližje standardiziranim vrednostim. Glavni cilj diplomskega dela je bil slikovno in mersko prikazati razlike med tiskovinami, ki so bile natisnjene z ofsetnim tiskom in elektrofotografijo na premazan in nepremazan papir. Rezultati so pokazali, da je vpliv premaza na papirju velik, saj so bile izmerjene vrednosti vedno višje pri premazanem papirju. Vizualna analiza je prav tako pokazala, katere so možne napake in kakšno kakovost lahko dosežemo s posamezno tehniko tiska. Ob upoštevanju navedenih ugotovitev lahko lažje izberemo tehniko tiska za določene tiskovine.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:ofsetni tisk, elektrofotografija, tiskovna prehodnost, tiskarska prehodnost, vizualna analiza
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:NTF - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering
Year:2023
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-144381 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:17.02.2023
Views:560
Downloads:70
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Printability in offset printing and electrophotography
Abstract:
Printing techniques are divided into classic and digital techniques. The most commonly used offset printing is classified under classic and electrophotography under digital techniques. These two techniques are prevalent in terms of application. The theoretical part of the diploma thesis describes both printing techniques, their printing forms and the printing process. The experimental work describes how the test form is created in Adobe InDesign and what it contains. The measurements taken with a spectrodensitometer are added, which were divided into three parts, namely: measurements of the optical density of the colour, measurements of raster tonal values and measurements of L*a*b* values. Measurements are also shown graphically for different techniques and different types of paper. The experimental part was designed to print the same test form on 170 and 80g coated paper and on 170 and 80g uncoated paper. After the measurements, image cut-outs of various printing errors are shown, and image cut-outs which are used for comparison in visual analysis. The purpose of comparing these four different prints is to confirm through measurements which printing technique is closest to the standardized values on which type of paper. The main goal of the thesis was to show the differences between printed materials printed with offset printing and electrophotography on coated and uncoated paper. The results showed that the paper coating has a great influence, as the measured values were always higher for uncoated paper. The visual analysis also showed possible errors and what quality can be achieved with each printing technique. Considering the above findings, we can more easily choose the printing technique for certain printed materials. With this, we can more easily achieve optimal values that are as close as possible to the standard ones.

Keywords:offset printing, electrophotography, printability, runnability, visual analysis

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back