izpis_h1_title_alt

Opredelitev imunskega odziva po in vivo genskem elektroprenosu DNA-cepiva proti virusu SARS-CoV-2
ID Gorše, Tim (Author), ID Kamenšek, Urška (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Kos, Špela (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (5,18 MB)
MD5: CA5BC15ED51BB50278FC5349A6893DA0

Abstract
Konec decembra 2019 so iz Kitajskega mesta Vuhan poročali o izbruhu atipične pljučnice neznanega izvora. Analize genoma so pokazale, da gre za novega predstavnika koronavirusov, ki so ga poimenovali virus SARS-CoV-2. V manj kot enem letu od izbruha je virus zaradi visoke stopnje kužnosti povzročil pandemijo. Za njeno obvladovanje je bil razvoj učinkovitega cepiva nujno potreben. Do danes so bila odobrena 4 cepiva proti SARS-CoV-2, ki temeljijo na mRNA in adenovirusnih vektorjih. Veliko pozornosti je bilo usmerjene tudi v razvoj DNA-cepiv proti SARS-CoV-2. Učinkovitost DNA-cepiva je pogojena z metodo vnosa v tarčno tkivo. Ena od metod je elektroporacija, s katero povečamo permeabilnost celičnih membran in olajšamo vstop DNA v citoplazmo celic. Transfekcijo DNA v tarčno celico z elektroporacijo imenujemo genski elektroprenos. Glavni namen magistrske naloge je bil primerjati imunski odziv po genskem elektroprenosu DNA-cepiva proti virusu SARS-CoV-2 v mišico in kožo eksperimentalnih miši. Za genski elektroprenos smo pripravili mešanice plazmidnih DNA z geni, ki kodirajo za N in S proteina virusa SARS-CoV-2 in citokin IL-12. Imunski odziv smo vrednotili v vzorcih odvzetih na 13. in 28. dan po cepljenju. S komercialno dostopnimi testi ELISA smo določali prisotnost in koncentracije IFNγ (nespecifična imunost), ter titer anti-N in anti-S IgG protiteles (specifična humoralna imunost). S testom tetramerov smo določali delež CD8+N+ in CD8+S+ T celic (specifična celična imunost). Dokazali smo, da genski elektroprenos DNA-cepiva izzove tako nespecifično kot specifično imunost proti N in S proteinu. Ugotovili smo, da je aktivacija imunskega odziva intenzivnejša po genskem elektroprenosu v mišico in, da je v našem primeru N protein bolj imunogen od S proteina. Potrdili smo tudi, da je genski elektroprenos ustrezna metoda za vnašanje DNA-cepiva v tarčno tkivo.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, DNA-cepivo, genski elektroprenos, plazmidi, imunski odziv, ELISA test
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[T. Gorše]
Year:2023
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-144248 This link opens in a new window
UDC:577.2
COBISS.SI-ID:141547523 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:07.02.2023
Views:852
Downloads:129
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Evaluation of immune response after in vivo gene electrotransfer of DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2
Abstract:
At the end of December 2019, an outbreak of atypical pneumonia of unknown origin was reported from the Wuhan, China. Genomic analysis has shown that it is a new representative of coronviruses, which has been named SARS-CoV-2. In less than a year after the outbreak, the virus caused a pandemic due to its high infectivity. The development of an effective vaccine was necessary for its control. To date, four SARS-CoV-2 vaccines based on mRNA and adenoviral vectors have been approved. A lot of attention has also been focused on the development of DNA-vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of the DNA-vaccine depends on the method of introduction into the target tissue. One of the methods is electroporation, which increases the permeability of cell membranes and facilitates the entry od DNA into the cell cytoplasm. The transfection of DNA into a target cell by electroporation is called gene electrotransfer. The aim of the master's thesis was to compare the immune response after gene electrotransfer of the DNA-vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and cytokine IL-12 in the muscle and skin tissue. The immune response was evaluated in samples taken on the 13th and 28th day after vaccination. Commercially available ELISA tests were used to determine the presence and concentrations of IFNγ (non-specific immunity), as well as the titer of anti-N and anti-S IgG antibodies (specific humoral immunity). The tetramer test was used to determine portion of CD8+N+ and CD8+S+ T cells (specific cellular immunity). We have demonstrated that gene electrotransfer of DNA-vaccine elicits both non-specific and specific immunity against N and S protein. We found that the activation of the immune response is more intense after gene electrotransfer into the muscle and that in our case the N protein is more immunogenic than the S protein. We have also confirmed that gene electrotransfer is suitable method for introducing a DNA-vaccine into the target tissue.

Keywords:SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, DNA-vaccine, gene electrotransfer, plasmids, immune response, ELISA test

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back