izpis_h1_title_alt

Xu Fuguan’s methodology for interpreting Chinese intellectual history : an original innovation or the impact of Gadamerian lines of thought?
ID Sernelj, Tea (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,45 MB)
MD5: 399000CD1C45E530F321245BADEFA138
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/11295/10755 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
The article examines the research methodology of Chinese intellectual history developed by the Modern Confucian Xu Fuguan 徐復觀 (1904–1982). His novel methodological approach differed significantly from the methodology advocated by Fu Sinian 傅斯年 (1896–1950), the founder of the Institute of History and Philology of Academia Sinica in 1928, who advocated a rigorous adoption of Western scientific methodology in historical research, based exclusively on a philological perspective. Fu Sinian’s methodological approach, however, prevailed among Chinese historians in mainland China in the first half of the 20th century and in Taiwan after 1949. Xu Fuguan was highly critical of such an approach, considering it inadequate and inappropriate because it did not allow for conceptual interpretations on the one hand, and disregarded the contextualization and historical development of concepts and meanings on the other. Xu’s methodology is based on the application of the hermeneutic circle, which Xu calls dynamic and structural holism from a comparative perspective. In his methodology, a method of seeking embodied experience (zhui tiyan de fangfa 追體驗的方法) and intersubjectivenes (zhuti jianxing 主題間性) play a crucial role as they enable actualization of and communication with ancient thinkers in present times. However, Xu’s methodological approaches are also strikingly similar to Gadamer’s method of the fusion of horizons and Schleiermacher’s hermeneutic circle, which begs the question whether his critique of Fu’s adoption of Western methods was not based upon hypocritical grounds.

Language:English
Keywords:Gadamer, Xu Fuguan, methodology, dynamic and structural holism, the method of seeking embodied experience, contextualization, hermeneutic circle, fusion of horizons
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2023
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 335-351
Numbering:Vol. 11 (27), iss. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-143866 This link opens in a new window
UDC:1(510)
ISSN on article:2232-5131
COBISS.SI-ID:137973763 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:16.01.2023
Views:364
Downloads:49
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Asian studies
Publisher:Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Založba Univerze v Ljubljani
ISSN:2232-5131
COBISS.SI-ID:265206272 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.
Licensing start date:10.01.2023

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Xu Fuguanova interpretacija kitajske idejne zgodovine: izvirna inovacija ali vpliv Gadamerjeve miselnosti
Keywords:Gadamer, Xu Fuguan, metodologija, dinamični in strukturni holizem, metoda iskanja utelešene izkušnje, kontekstualizacija, hermenevtični krog, zlitje horizontov

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P6-0243
Name:Azijski jeziki in kulture

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:N6-0161
Name:Humanizem v medkulturni perspektivi: Evropa in Kitajska

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back