izpis_h1_title_alt

Characteristics and usefulness of trunk muscle endurance tests on the Roman chairin healthy adults
ID Petrič, Maja (Author), ID Zaletel-Kragelj, Lijana (Author), ID Vauhnik, Renata (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (9,79 MB)
MD5: 828510FF2DD6F303CFAE9BAC1F8BE0C4
URLURL - Research data, Visit https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php? lang=slv&id=142472 This link opens in a new window
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://peerj.com/articles/14469/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Background Adequate trunk muscle endurance is considered to be an important indicator of good low back stability; therefore, its assessment is needed when determining an individual’s risk for back pain. Optimal tests to assess each trunk muscle group separately are difficult to find. The objective of this study was to verify if two groups of trunk muscle endurance tests (standard and alternative) show comparable results in terms of muscle endurance ratios, holding times and rated perceived effort to perform each test. Methods The study was designed as a quasi-experimental repeated-measures design. There was a single group of participants who took part in two different trunk muscle endurance testing. Sixty-eight healthy adult volunteers, aged 20–45 years (31.9 ± 7.2 years), without recent musculoskeletal injury or disorder participated in the study. All participants finished the study. Trunk muscle endurance tests as tested on the Roman chair (B tests) were compared with standard tests as suggested by McGill (A tests). Each group of tests consisted of an endurance test for trunk extensors, trunk flexors, and lateral trunk muscles for left and right side. The order of tests’ performances was randomly assigned to each participant, whereby a participant did perform A and B tests in the same order. In each test of A and B the holding time was recorded and a perceived effort in each test performance was also assessed by participants. Post testing performance the four ratios of trunk muscles endurance comparison were calculated for each group of tests to determine if there is a good or poor ratio between muscles. Results of each participant were compared for trunk muscle endurance ratio calculations, holding times and rated perceived effort for A and B tests. Results Results showed comparable trunk muscle endurance ratios in the three ratios observed, except for the flexors: extensors ratio (AFL:EX: 1.2 (IQR: 0.7–1.6) vs. BFL:EX: 0.6 (IQR: 0.3–0.8); p < 0.001). As compared to A tests, holding times were significantly longer in B tests for the extensors (AEX: 125.5 s (IQR: 104.8–182.8 s) vs. BEX: 284.0 s (IQR: 213.0–342.3 s); p < 0.001) and lateral trunk muscles (AL-LM: 61.0 s (IQR: 48.3–80.8 s) vs. BL-LM: 131.5 s (IQR: 95.5–158.5 s); AR-LM: 63.5 s (IQR: 45.8–77.3 s) vs. BR-LM: 113.0 s (IQR: 86.3–148.8 s); p < 0.001), both were also rated as slightly easier to perform in the extensors (ARPE-EX: 13 (IQR: 12.0–14.0) vs BRPE-EX: 11 (IQR: 10.0–13.0); pRPE-EX < 0.001) and lateral muscles testing (ARPE-LM: 14.0 (IQR: 12.3–15.8) vs. BRPE-LM: 13.0 (IQR: 12.0–15.0); pRPE-LM = 0.001). Conclusions A and B tests are comparable in three of four trunk muscle endurance ratios, while longer holding times and lower perceived effort to perform were observed in most of the B tests. The Roman chair tests could be used as an alternative to standard tests.

Language:English
Keywords:trunk muscles, endurance, Roman chair, test characteristics
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:07.12.2022
Year:2022
Number of pages:16 str.
Numbering:Vol. 10, art. 14469
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-143571 This link opens in a new window
UDC:615.8
ISSN on article:2167-8359
DOI:10.7717/peerj.14469 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:132894979 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:28.12.2022
Views:359
Downloads:77
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:PeerJ
Shortened title:PeerJ
Publisher:PeerJ Inc.
ISSN:2167-8359
COBISS.SI-ID:31891929 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:07.12.2022

Secondary language

Language:Undetermined
Keywords:mišice trupa, vzdržljivost, rimski stol, lastnosti testa

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P3-0388
Name:Mehanizmi varovanja zdravja

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P3-0429
Name:Slovenski raziskovalni program za celostno obravnavo raka SLORApro

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back