Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
A Bayesian improvement of the proportionality principle
ID
Pečarič, Mirko
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(717,33 KB)
MD5: D64B07304DF35DD60286A2B1027C7563
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/raju.12366
Image galllery
Abstract
The principle of proportionality is seen as the highest peak of structural, logical thinking that enables balancing between constitutional principles and their interferences. So far, Alexy's weight formula has been the most advanced approach in structured balancing of proportionality stricto sensu, while this paper shows it as still too subjective. Despite judicial tests—or different, manifestly inappropriate reasonableness tests—proportionality stricto sensu hides some form of the jumping-to-conclusions bias, because the inference is made through a subjective lens. The paper presents structured legal balancing (and hence reasoning) based on Bayes’ theorem. This paper, based on the connection between probability and hypothetical legal norms, transfers the four-part structure of proportionality into the relevant four-part structure of the Bayes tree. This transfer shows the first as flawed due to its failing to consider means that can have the same effects as the considered ones. Only by inclusion of the latter can the total probability of a considered case be established. Numerical proportionality à la Bayes can be further improved through the use of public-value weights that are obtained from surveys or online communities of people giving weights in the real time (collective wisdom). The Bayesian approach can also be used in adjudication as a control in assessing judicial standards in use.
Language:
English
Keywords:
law
,
legal reasoning
,
the principle of proportionality
,
the Bayesian approach
,
improvements
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FU - Faculty of Administration
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2022
Number of pages:
Str. 419-436
Numbering:
Vol. 35, no. 4
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-142824
UDC:
34
ISSN on article:
0952-1917
DOI:
10.1111/raju.12366
COBISS.SI-ID:
131430915
Publication date in RUL:
29.11.2022
Views:
598
Downloads:
122
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Ratio juris : an international journal of jurisprudence and philosophy of law
Shortened title:
Ratio juris
Publisher:
University of Bologna, Wiley
ISSN:
0952-1917
COBISS.SI-ID:
360529
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:
A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
pravo
,
pravno sklepanje
,
načelo sorazmernosti
,
Bayesov pristop
,
izboljšave
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back