izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava upravljanja izbranih evropskih mestnih gozdov
ID Žibrat, Edo (Author), ID Bončina, Andrej (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Simončič, Tina (Co-mentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (4,40 MB)
MD5: DA0EFFB5D5B4995D4A20795CE7F67E06

Abstract
Cilj diplomske naloge je primerjati upravljanje mestnih gozdov v evropskih mestih, vključenih v projekt INTERREG URBforDAN. Primerjali smo naslednje značilnosti: površino mestnih gozdov, lastništvo mestnih gozdov, pomembne funkcije, conacijo mestnih gozdov, upravljanje, financiranje ter participacijo pri upravljanju mestnih gozdov. Analizirali smo sedem upravljavskih načrtov za mestne gozdove, ki so bili pripravljeni v okviru navedenega projekta. Ugotovili smo, da se velikost obravnavanih mestnih gozdov znatno razlikuje (od 40 do 2151 ha). Prevladuje javno lastništvo gozdov, izjema so mestni gozdovi Ljubljane, kjer znaša delež zasebnih gozdov 82,5 %. Vsi analizirani načrti obravnavajo različne ekosistemske storitve mestnih gozdov. Največ razlik med načrti je pri pomenu proizvodnje lesa. Obravnavani načrti vključujejo conacijo ekosistemskih storitev, povezanih z velikim javnim interesom. Conacija je temeljna orientacijska karta za deležnike gozdov, hkrati pa je pomemben pripomoček za upravljanje z gozdovi. V večini mest je v upravljanje vključenih več akterjev, med ključnimi so mestne občine in gozdarska stroka. Za doslej navedene značilnosti mestnih gozdov smo podatke pridobili iz upravljavskih načrtov, pri obravnavi participacije pri upravljanju mestnih gozdov pa smo v analizo vključili tudi operativne dele načrtov, saj upravljavski načrti participacije podrobneje ne opredeljujejo. V analiziranih operativnih delih načrtov je participacija deležnikov poudarjena v vseh mestih.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:mestni gozdovi, trajnostno gospodarjenje, participacija, URBforDAN
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[E. Žibrat]
Year:2022
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-142805 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*6:630*9(4)(043.2)=163.6
COBISS.SI-ID:131211523 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:27.11.2022
Views:743
Downloads:34
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of urban forest management in Europe
Abstract:
The objective of the thesis is to compare the management of urban forests in European cities included in the INTERREG URBforDAN project. We compared the following characteristics: area of urban forests, ownership of urban forests, important functions of urban forests, management and financing, and participation in urban forest management. We analysed seven management plans for urban forests that were prepared under the project. We found that the size of the urban forests concerned varies considerably (from 40 to 2151 ha). Public ownership of forests dominates, with the exception of Ljubljana's urban forests, where the share of private forests totals 82.5%. All the analysed plans address different ecosystem services of urban forests. The most significant differences between the plans are in the importance of timber production. The plans under consideration include the zoning of ecosystem services of high public interest. The zoning presents the basic orientation map for forest stakeholders and an important tool for forest management. In most cities, several actors are involved in management, the key actors include municipality and forest management professionals. For the above characteristics of urban forests, we have obtained data from the management plans, but when considering participation in urban forest management, we have also included the operative parts of the management plans in the analysis, as the strategic plans do not define participation in detail. In the analysed operative parts of the plans, stakeholder participation is emphasised in all cities.

Keywords:urban forest, sustainable management, participation, URBforDAN

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back