izpis_h1_title_alt

Pojav korupcije pri javnem naročanju v Sloveniji
ID ŽNIDAR, NIKA (Author), ID Sever, Tina (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (665,95 KB)
MD5: C524A97F3178C69FF535B71D272CED7B

Abstract
Namen diplomskega dela je predstaviti javno naročanje in korupcijo v Republiki Sloveniji, na enostaven in bralcu dostopen način, izpostaviti ključne dejavnike in posledice korupcije in povezati koruptivna dejanja ter najbolj izpostavljene postopke pri javnem naročanju. Namen diplomskega dela je približati bralcu problematiko koruptivnih dejanj v postopkih javnega naročanja. Predstavljena je Analiza korupcijskih tveganj v postopkih javnega naročanja, ki je bila leta 2020 narejena s strani Komisije za preprečevanje korupcije in s tem postavljen obseg suma korupcije med leti 2014 in 2018 na področju javnega naročanja. Izpostavljeni so dotični postopki javnega naročanja, kjer se sum korupcije pojavlja največkrat in prikazana količina korupcije v letu 2021 v Sloveniji. Uporabljeni sta deskriptivna metoda, s katero so pojasnjeni pridobljeni podatki, in normativna metoda, ki predstavlja postopke na področju javnega naročanja. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se sum korupcije največkrat pojavi pri evidenčnih naročilih, ki so izjema po Zakonu o javnem naročanju in pri poenostavljenih postopkih, torej pri postopkih naročil male vrednosti, ki so lahko posledično manj transparentni. V primerjavi z leti pred letom 2021 se je v Sloveniji korupcija povečala. S tem se je Slovenija oddaljila od številnih evropskih držav. Pomembno je, da vsak posameznik prijavi vsak sum koruptivnega dejanja, in da pristojni organi pravilno obravnavajo vse prijave. Velik vpliv na pravilno izvedbo postopka ima tudi znanje tistega, ki vodi postopek, saj mora podrobno poznati zakon in ga posledično prenesti v prakso. Praktično znanje izvedbe postopkov vsak posameznik dobi šele preko izkušenj, zato je pomembno, da je vsak nadrejeni pozoren na napake novo zaposlenega na dotičnem področju.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:javna naročila, korupcija, koruptivna dejanja, Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije, kršitev, naročnik, dobavitelj
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Publisher:[N. Žnidar]
Year:2022
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-142471 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:10.11.2022
Views:571
Downloads:172
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Phenomenon of corruption in public procurement in Slovenia
Abstract:
The purpose of this thesis is to introduce public procurement and corruption in the Republic of Slovenia in a simple way, accessible to the reader, to highlight the key factors and consequences of corruption, and connect corrupt behaviors with the most vulnerable procedures in public procurement, with the aim of making the problems of corrupt behaviors in public procurement procedures more accessible to the reader. It introduces an analysis of corruption risks in public procurement procedures, which was carried out by the Commission for the prevention of corruption in 2020 and defined the scope of suspicion of corruption between 2014 and 2018 in the field of public ordering. It highlights specific public ordering procedures, where the suspicion of corruption occurred most often, and the assumed quantity of corruption in Slovenia in 2021. The methods used are descriptive, which explains the obtained data, and normative, which introduces procedures in the field of public procurement. It was established that the suspicion of corruption most often occurs in registered orders, which are exceptional under the Public Procurement Act, and in simplified procedures, which are consequentially less transparent. Corruption in Slovenia has also increased in 2021 and has deviated away from several European countries. It is important for each individual to report every suspicion of corruptive behavior, and for competent authorities to treat all reports correctly. The knowledge of the individual, handling the procedure, has a significant impact on the correct execution of the procedure, since they need to be familiar with the content of the law in detail, as well as the practical aspect, which they become familiar with through work.

Keywords:public procurement, corruption, corrupt behaviors, Commission for the prevention of corruption, violation, subscriber, supplier

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back