The goal of this master's thesis was to investigate whether conducting a hiking trip with our without a dog results in differential dog’s owner activity. There is very little research on the subject, despite the increasing inclusion of dogs in everyday life activities there is scarcity of data on the topic which is undoubtedly worthy of investigation.
Seventeen participants, aged between 16 and 59 volunteered for the present study. Each of these participants was an owner of middle aged, but not short muzzled dog that also took part in the study. The experiment was carried out by conducting two hiking trips to 826 m high St. Primož, located above Stahovica - One with dogs and one without, approximately one week apart. Elevation change is 396 m and the path is marked as easy. Both hikes were carried out in similar environmental conditions and at the same time of the day. Before the start of each hike, each of the participants was also given a questionnaire pertaining to their and their dog’s characteristics. The questionnaire included questions on their psychophysical condition and information about their hiking experiences. The participants also filled the same questionnaires at the end of both hikes, this time also amended with questions regarding their experience with the hikes. The participants were also given GPS hand watches of various manufacturers to measure the following parameters: average heart rate, resting heart rate, distance traveled, travel time and pace of each participant. Descriptive variables were depicted with frequencies and frequency ratios, whilst the numeric variables were depicted using averages and standard deviations. The numeric variables were analyzed for distribution normality (Shapiro-Wilkov test). The physiological parameters, distance traveled and travel time with and without an accompanying dog's presence were compared using a t-test or Wilcoxon test. Significance was defined at p = 0.05.
The obtained results suggested certain influence of accompanying dog on the owner, despite the fact that most measured parameters did not show statistically significant differences. During the hike with dogs maximal heart rate was significantly greater as compared to when dogs were not present (+11 beats/min, p < 0.05).
|