izpis_h1_title_alt

Stališča in izkušnje učiteljev razrednega pouka s sodelovalnim učenjem učencev
ID Drobnič, Hana (Author), ID Polak, Alenka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Gradišek, Polona (Comentor)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/7373/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Sodelovanje je pomemben dejavnik v procesu razvoja potencialov pri otrocih. Upoštevanje in spodbujanje interakcije med učenci v procesu učenja je temelj, na katerem so se razvile različne strukture sodelovalnega učenja. Temeljna načela sodelovalnega učenja izhajajo iz Piagetove razvojne teorije, ki je uveljavila konstruktivistični pristop, znanstvenih ugotovitev Vigotskega o vplivu socialnih dejavnikov na razvoj višjih mentalnih funkcij ter motivacijske teorije sodelovanja Martina Deutscha. Sodelovalno učenje se v praksi odraža kot uporaba različnih oblik in metod dela pri reševanju problemov, usvajanju novih učnih vsebin ter učenju v najširšem pomenu besede. Ključno vlogo pri tem ima socialna interakcija, ki poteka med učenci znotraj sodelovalne skupine, v kateri so učenci ves čas aktivni. Večina empiričnih raziskav na področju sodelovalnega učenja dokazuje pozitiven vpliv sodelovalnega učenja na učnem in socialnem področju. Pomembno vlogo pri vzpostavljanju sodelovalnih učnih situacij v razredu ima učitelj, ki s ciljem spodbujanja sodelovalnega učenja deluje kot svetovalec in strokovnjak za spodbujanje učinkovitega delovanja skupine. Za dosego ciljev sodelovalnega učenja mora pri načrtovanju pouka upoštevati osnovna načela omenjene oblike učenja: delo v manjših skupinah, pozitivna soodvisnost članov skupine, odgovornost posameznika, uporaba ustreznih sodelovalnih veščin za delo v skupini, ustrezna struktura nalog in analiza procesov v skupini. Pri uvajanju sodelovalnega učenja v pouk mora učitelj učence naučiti uporabe različnih sodelovalnih struktur, namenjenih utrjevanju znanja, razvoju pojmov in sodelovalnim projektom. V empiričnem delu magistrskega dela, ki temelji na kvantitativnem raziskovalnem pristopu, smo z uporabo spletnega anketnega vprašalnika raziskali, kakšno znanje imajo učitelji razrednega pouka o sodelovalnem učenju, kako kompetentni se počutijo za vpeljevanje te oblike učenja v pouk, kakšne izkušnje imajo z organizacijo in izvajanjem pouka v sodelovalnih skupinah pred epidemijo COVIDA-19 in v času poučevanja na daljavo, ter kakšna so njihova stališča do omenjene oblike učenja bodisi pri svojem lastnem učenju bodisi pri poučevanju učencev. Raziskava je temeljila na namenskem, neslučajnostnem vzorčenju, vzorec pa je vključeval 112 učiteljev razrednega pouka iz celotne Slovenije. Z raziskavo smo ugotovili, da so učitelji razrednega pouka po večini seznanjeni s sodelovalnim učenjem, vendar je njihovo poznavanje načel in struktur sodelovalnega učenja pomanjkljivo. Večina izmed njih je mnenja, da so dovolj strokovno usposobljeni za vpeljevanje sodelovalnega učenja v pouk, vendar potrebujejo več lastnih praktičnih izkušenj na tem področju. Prednosti, ki jih učitelji opažajo pri vpeljevanju sodelovalnega učenja, so: sodelovanje med učenci, učenje od sovrstnikov, boljši medsebojni odnosi in razredna klima, medsebojna pomoč, urjenje socialnih veščin, večja motivacija za učenje, večja aktivnost učencev, spoštovanje drugih in drugačnih mnenj, večja odgovornost do skupine in naloge, boljše pomnjenje, komunikacija in kritično razmišljanje, večja strpnost, samostojnost pri učenju in kvalitetnejše znanje. Pri vpeljevanju sodelovalnega učenja v pouk učitelje najbolj ovira čas, ki ga morajo nameniti natančni pripravi učnih ur sodelovalnega učenja, urjenju sodelovalnih veščin in podajanju navodil učencem. Težave vidijo v tem, da sodelovalno učenje zahteva zelo veliko učiteljevega truda in priprave, da so nekateri učenci pri delu v sodelovalnih skupinah neaktivni in da nekateri učenci prelagajo odgovornost na druge člane skupine. Kar dve tretjini učiteljev je bilo mnenja, da je pouk na daljavo vplival na vpeljevanje sodelovalnega učenja v poučevanje. Vzrok za to so učitelji pripisovali pomanjkanju znanja IKT pri učencih, nesamostojnosti mlajših učencev pri uporabi tehnologije, veliki zmedi zaradi organizacije pouka na daljavo, premalo časa in slabšemu nadzoru nad učenci. Rezultati so pokazali, da imajo anketirani učitelji razrednega pouka sicer pozitivna stališča glede vpliva sodelovalnega učenja na učence, vendar nimajo pozitivnih stališč glede priprav, ki jih sodelovalno učenje zahteva od njih. Statistično pomembne pozitivne korelacije se pojavljajo samo med pogostostjo organiziranja dela učencev v sodelovalnih skupinah pri poučevanju in stališčem, da ko učenci delajo v sodelovalnih skupinah, se učijo večje strpnosti do drugih ali drugačnih idej in stališčem, da učenje v sodelovalnih skupinah izboljšuje medsebojne odnose v razredu. Statistično pomembne pozitivne korelacije se pojavljajo tudi med pogostostjo uvajanja/vključevanja sodelovalnega učenja učencev pri posameznih etapah učnega procesa in stališčem, da delo v sodelovalnih skupinah prispeva k boljšim učnim dosežkom učencev kot pa individualno učenje. Statistično pomembne negativne korelacije se pojavljajo med pogostostjo vključevanja sodelovalnega učenja v pouk glede na učni predmet in stališčem, da pri sodelovalnem učenju lahko učenci jemljejo šolsko delo premalo resno ter med pogostostjo organiziranja dela učencev v sodelovalnih skupinah pri poučevanju ter stališčem, da učenje v sodelovalnih skupinah vodi le v prepire in slabo voljo učencev. Z raziskavo smo želeli učitelje ozaveščati o pomembnosti sodelovalnega učenja, jih motivirati za vpeljevanje sodelovalnega učenja v pouk in prispevati k njihovemu profesionalnemu razvoju na tem področju.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Sodelovalna kultura
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Year:2022
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-141051 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:121923331 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:27.09.2022
Views:790
Downloads:149
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Primary school teachers' views and experiences of collaborative student learning
Abstract:
Cooperation is an important factor in developing potentials in children. Taking account of and encouraging interaction between pupils in the process of learning is the basis on which various structures of cooperative learning have taken shape. The basic principles of cooperative learning are derived from Piaget’s developmental theory, which established a constructivist approach, Vigotski’s scientific findings on the impact of social factors on the development of higher mental functions and Martin Deutsch’s theory of cooperation and competition. In practice, cooperative learning is reflected in the application of different forms and methods of work to solve problems, assimilate new teaching content and learn in the broadest sense of the word. Social interaction between pupils in a cooperative group where they are being active all the time plays a crucial role here. Most of empirical research on cooperative learning proves a positive impact of cooperative learning on learning and socialisation. An important role in establishing cooperative learning situations is played by the teacher, who acts as an advisor and expert in encouraging effective functioning of the group with the aim of promoting cooperative learning. To achieve the goals of cooperative learning the basic principles of this form of learning have to be taken into account when planning the lessons: working in small groups, positive co-dependency of group members, individual’s responsibility, applying adequate cooperative skills for group work, adequate task structure and analysis of group processes. When introducing cooperative learning to classes the teacher has to teach the pupils how to use various cooperative structures aimed at consolidating knowledge, advancing the understanding of concepts and at cooperative projects. In the empirical part of the master’s thesis based on quantitative research approach, we used an online survey to see what kind of knowledge class teachers possess about cooperative learning, how competent they feel to introduce this form of learning in lessons, what their experience is with organising and holding class in cooperative groups before the COVID-19 epidemic and during remote teaching and what their attitudes are regarding this form of learning when it comes to both their own learning process and teaching pupils. The survey was based on intentional, non-incidental sampling and the sample consisted of 112 class teachers from all over Slovenia. The survey showed that while class teachers are mostly acquainted with cooperative learning, their familiarity with its principles and structures is deficient. Most of them believe they are professionally qualified to introduce cooperative learning to class, but need more practical experience in this field. The teachers observe the following advantages of applying cooperative learning: cooperation among pupils, learning from peers, improved interpersonal relationships and overall atmosphere in the class, pupils helping one another, refining of the pupils’ social skills, increased motivation for learning, more active pupils, respect for the opinions of others and opinions that are different, greater sense of responsibility towards the group and the task at hand, better memory retention, communication and critical thinking, greater tolerance, independence in learning and better quality of knowledge. When it comes to integrating cooperative learning in classes, teachers feel most impeded in terms of the time they have to devote to thoroughly prepare cooperative learning lessons, perfect cooperative skills and instruct pupils. The main issues they observe is that cooperative learning requires a lot of effort and preparation from teachers, that some pupils don’t actively engage in work in cooperative groups, and that some pupils shift responsibility on other group members. Two thirds of teachers believed that remote teaching affected the introduction of cooperative learning to teaching. The teachers attributed this to the pupils’ inadequate ICT skills, lack of independence amongst younger pupils in using technology, great confusion due to the organisation of remote teaching, insufficient time and inferior ability to supervise pupils. The results showed that the class teachers surveyed have positive opinions regarding the impact of cooperative learning on pupils, which, however, cannot be said about their opinions on the level of preparation required from them for this type of learning. Statistically significant positive correlations only appear between the frequency of organising the pupils’ work in cooperative groups in the course of teaching and the opinion that, while working in cooperative groups, pupils are learning to be more tolerant of others and different ideas, and the opinion that learning in cooperative groups improves interpersonal relationships in the class. Statistically significant positive correlations are also evident between the frequency of introducing/including cooperative learning of pupils within individual stages of the learning process and the opinion that work in cooperative groups contributes to better learning achievements of pupils than individual learning. Statistically significant negative correlations appear between the frequency of including cooperative learning in classes by subject and the opinion that pupils may not take schoolwork seriously enough during cooperative learning, and between the frequency of organising the pupils’ work in cooperative groups in the course of teaching and the opinion that learning in cooperative groups only leads to quarrels and bad mood amongst pupils. The aim of our survey was to raise teachers’ awareness of the importance of cooperative learning, motivate teachers to introduce cooperative learning to class and contribute to their professional development in this area.

Keywords:Cooperative culture

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back