izpis_h1_title_alt

Učinkovitost uporabe šobe z variabilnim pretokom pri zatiranju rdečega žitnega strgača Oulema melenopus (L.)
ID Benc, Andrej (Author), ID Vučajnk, Filip (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Trdan, Stanislav (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (4,69 MB)
MD5: 9FCAB6F2DE8ABF4046969CE5072B845A

Abstract
Leta 2020 smo izvedli poljski poskus, v katerem smo uporabili šobo z variabilnim pretokom TD VR 1,5 in kontaktni piretroid za zatiranje rdečega žitnega strgača (Oulema melanopus [L.]). V poskusu smo uporabili tri sorte ozimne pšenice 'Falado', 'Gorolka' in 'Illico'. Tlak škropljenja z uporabljeno šobo je znašal 2 bara, 4 bare in 6 barov, kar je pomenilo 117 l/ha, 207 l/ha in 271 l/ha. Na listu zastavičarju in nižje ležečem listu smo ugotavljali pokritost in razporeditev kapljic z vodno občutljivimi lističi. Ocenjevali smo poškodbe listne površine in analizirali pridelek ozimne pšenice. Odstotek pokritosti in število odtisov kapljic je naraščalo s povečanjem tlaka škropljenja od 2 barov na 6 barov, tako na listu zastavičarju kot na prvem listu, ne glede na sorto. Pri sorti 'Gorolka' je bil odstotek poškodovane listne površine višji zaradi rdečega žitnega strgača kot pri ostalih dveh sortah. Med tlaki škropljenja 2, 4 in 6 barov ni bilo razlik v odstotku poškodb listne površine, medtem ko je bilo največ poškodb na kontrolni parceli (neškropljeno). Tudi v pridelku zrnja ni bilo razlik med tlaki škropljenja. Pri sorti 'Gorolka' je bil na kontrolni parceli občutno nižji pridelek zrnja in prav tako absolutna masa zrnja v primerjavi z ostalima dvema sortama. Rezultati kažejo, da lahko tudi pri nizkem tlaku škropljenja s kontaktnim piretroidom 2 bara in porabi vode 117 l/ha dosežemo primerljiv pridelek zrnja kot pri višjih tlakih škropljenja 4 in 6 barov ter višji porabi vode.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:šobe, rdeči žitni strgač, pridelek, ozimna pšenica
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Year:2022
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-140651 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:124374787 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:17.09.2022
Views:671
Downloads:63
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Use of a variable flow nozzle in suppression of cereal leaf beetle Oulema melenopus (L.)
Abstract:
The field trial was executed in 2020 with the variable flow rate nozzle TD VR 1.5 and contact pyrethroid for the control of cereal leaf beetle (Oulema melanopus [L.]). Three different winter wheat cultivars – 'Falado', 'Gorolka' and 'Illico' – were used in the trial. The spraying pressure was 2 bar, 4 bar and 6 bar providing the water rate of 117 l/ha, 207 l/ha and 271 l/ha, respectively. The coverage and arrangement of droplets on the flag leaf and the lower lying leaf were examined with water sensitive papers. The leaf area damage was evaluated and the winter wheat yield analysed. The coverage value and the droplet imprint number rose as the spraying pressure was increased from 2 to 6 bar, both on the flag leaf and the lower lying leaf regardless of wheat variety. The percentage of leaf area damaged by the cereal leaf beetle was higher for the 'Gorolka' variety than for the other two varieties. There was no difference in leaf area damage between the respective spraying pressures of 2, 4 and 6 bar, while the highest leaf damage was found on the control lot (unsprayed). Grain yield also remained unchanged with different spraying pressures. Both the grain yield and the absolute grain weight were significantly lower on the control lot for the Gorolka variety compared to the other two. Results show that a comparable grain yield can be achieved at a lower spraying pressure of 2 bar with contact pyrethroid and a lower water rate of 117 l/ha compared to higher spraying pressures of 4 and 6 bar and the accompanying higher water rates.

Keywords:nozzles, cereal leaf beetle, yield, winter wheat

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back