Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Primerjava splošne in zobozdravstvu prilagojene programske opreme računalniško podprtega oblikovanja : diplomsko delo
ID
Dresler, Urban
(
Author
),
ID
Bohinc, Peter
(
Mentor
)
More about this mentor...
,
ID
Fošnarič, Miha
(
Reviewer
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(5,87 MB)
MD5: 1D8D1F31F6761FD8A729906E93A4D994
Image galllery
Abstract
Uvod: Digitalizacija je prevzela področje zobne protetike. Vedno več laboratorijev sledi smeri digitalne izdelave zobnih nadomestkov. Digitalna izdelava zobnih nadomestkov zahteva uporabo programske opreme za računalniško oblikovanje. Cena programske opreme se razlikuje od brezplačnih do precej dragih. Laboratorijski zobni protetiki, ki so komaj začeli uvajati digitalizacijo v svoj delovni proces, imajo zato pred seboj težko odločitev. Namen: Namen te naloge je na podlagi strokovne literature opisati postopek dela s plačljivim, za zobno protetiko prilagojenim računalniškim programom ter z brezplačnim splošnim programom. Namen je bil tudi primerjati in ugotoviti, ali je določene izdelke možno izdelati v brezplačnem programu. Ugotoviti smo želeli, kakšna je razlika v porabljenem času oblikovanja v plačljivem in brezplačnem programu ter kakšna je stopnja težavnosti. Na podlagi tega smo ugotavljali smiselnost uporabe programske opreme, za katero je potrebno plačati, če vemo, da nam je dostopna tudi brezplačna programska oprema. Metode dela: Diplomsko delo je napisano na podlagi dela s programi. Uporabljena je deskriptivna metoda, podprta s slikovnim gradivom. Predznanje o delu z računalniškimi programi in protetičnimi izdelki je bilo podkrepljeno s strokovno literaturo. Osredotočili smo se na porabo časa ter zahtevnost oblikovanja. Postopek lahko delimo na štiri dele, in sicer v sledečem vrstnem redu: izdelava študijskega modela v računalniškem programu Meshmixer, izdelava študijskega modela v računalniškem programu podjetja 3Shape, izdelava kovinske baze v računalniškem programu Meshmixer, izdelava kovinske baze v računalniškem programu podjetja 3Shape. V rezultatih so sproti opisana opažanja glede kompleksnosti modelacije, porabljenega časa ter večjih težav, s katerimi smo se srečali. Po končani modelaciji enega izdelka v obeh programih sledi še primerjava postopkov v teh dveh programih. Po končani modelaciji smo vse izdelke natisnili s 3D tiskalnikom in primerjali kvaliteto. Razlog za začetek izdelave modela s programom Meshmixer pri modelaciji obeh izdelkov je večji približek k praktičnemu okolju zobnih protetikov, ki se odločajo za nabavo programa. V praksi bi bilo namreč smiselno preveriti, ali nam zadostuje brezplačen program, preden se odločimo za nakup plačljivega. Rezultati: V rezultatih so opisno in s slikovnim gradivom predstavljeni postopki izdelav študijskega modela ter kovinske baze v brezplačnem programu Meshmixer in plačljivih programih podjetja 3Shape OrthoAnalyzer ter Dental System. Primer brezplačnega računalniškega programa je pokazal, da je oba izdelka možno izdelati, vendar je poraba časa večja. Plačljivi računalniški programi te vodijo skozi postopek ter zmanjšajo možnost napak. Razprava in zaključek: Smiselnost uporabe brezplačnega ali plačljivega računalniškega programa je odvisna od količine časa, ki ga uporabnik lahko vloži ter njegovega predznanja na področju računalniškega programa Meshmixer ter računalništva in informatike nasploh. Programska oprema Meshmixer je namreč občutno težja za uporabo. V kolikor se je uporabnik pripravljen naučiti uporabe ter vložiti čas, lahko veliko prihrani.
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
diplomska dela
,
laboratorijska zobna protetika
,
CAD CAM
,
digitalizacija
,
Meshmixer
,
3Shape
Work type:
Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:
ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Place of publishing:
Ljubljana
Publisher:
[U. Dresler]
Year:
2022
Number of pages:
48 str.
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-140583
UDC:
616.31
COBISS.SI-ID:
121810691
Publication date in RUL:
16.09.2022
Views:
618
Downloads:
107
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Comparison of general and dentistry adapted software of computer aided design : diploma work
Abstract:
Introduction: Digitalization took over the field of dental prosthetics. More and more laboratories are following the way of digitally made dental prostheses. Digital production of dental prostheses requires the usage of software for computer design. The cost of the software differs from free to very expensive. Dental prosthetics, that have only begun to implement digitalization into the work process face a hard choice. Purpose: The purpose of this thesis was to describe the workflow of working with a payable dental prosthetics adjusted program and an opensource program. The purpose was also to compare and find out if it is possible to use an opensource program on certain products without bigger waste of time or quality. On this basis we tried to find out whether it pays off to use a payable computer program when a free option is available. Methods: The thesis was written on the basis of working with both computer programs. Descriptive method was used, supported with pictorial material. Prior knowledge of working with computer programs and prosthetic products was acquired from professional literature. We can divide the process in four parts in that order: making of a study model in Meshmixer, making of a study model in 3Shape, making of a metal base in Meshmixer, making of a metal base in 3Shape. Observations about the complexity of modelling, used time and bigger problems encountered are described in the results. We focused on time consumption and the complexity of the design. Modelling of the products in both computer programs is followed by the comparison of the process. This order was used to get to a closer approximation of the environment of dental prosthetics who are making a decision between the two types of programs. Results: Processes of making a study model and a metal base in free Meshmixer program and payable 3Shape programs are presented descriptively and visually. The free program showed it is possible to produce both products, but the waste of time is bigger. Payable programs guide you through the process and reduce the chances of making mistakes. Discussion and conclusion: Usefulness of choosing either a free or a payable program depends on individual’s available time and knowledge of Meshmixer program, computer science and informatics in general. Meshmixer program is a lot harder to use. If an individual is willing to learn how to use it and invest some time, he can save a lot.
Keywords:
diploma theses
,
laboratory dental prosthetics
,
CAD CAM
,
digitalization
,
Meshmixer
,
3Shape
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back