izpis_h1_title_alt

Performance of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva in detecting Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants
ID Uršič, Tina (Author), ID Kogoj, Rok (Author), ID Šikonja, Jaka (Author), ID Roškarič, Damijana (Author), ID Jevšnik Virant, Monika (Author), ID Bogovič, Petra (Author), ID Petrovec, Miroslav (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,31 MB)
MD5: 0299A879BBE59FA04FFF175F1A14949F
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.27898 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
A prospective cohort study was conducted during the Delta and Omicron severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic waves from paired nasopharyngeal swab (NPS or NP swab) and saliva samples taken from 624 participants. The study aimed to assess if any differences among participants from both waves could be observed and if any difference in molecular diagnostic performance could be observed among the two sample types. Samples were transported immediately to the laboratory to ensure the highest possible sample quality without any freezing and thawing steps before processing. Nucleic acids from saliva and NPS were prospectively extracted and SARS-CoV-2 was detected using a real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. All observed results were statistically analyzed. Although the results obtained with NP and saliva agreed overall, higher viral loads were observed in NP swabs regardless of the day of specimen collection in both SARS-CoV-2 epidemic waves. No significant difference could be observed between the two epidemic waves characterized by Delta or Omicron SARS-CoV-2. To note, Delta infection resulted in higher viral loads both in NP and saliva and more symptoms, including rhinorrhea, cough, and dyspnea, whereas Omicron wave patients more frequently reported sore throat. An increase in the mean log RNA of SARS-CoV-2 was observed with the number of expressed symptoms in both waves, however, the difference was not significant. Data confirmed that results from saliva were concordant with those from NP swabs, although saliva proved to be a challenging sample with frequent inhibitions that required substantial retesting.

Language:English
Keywords:SARS-CoV-2, nasopharyngeal swab, saliva, COVID‐19, real‐time RT‐PCR, SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnostics
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2022
Number of pages:Str. 4704-4711
Numbering:Vol. 94, iss. 10
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-140164 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616.9
ISSN on article:1096-9071
DOI:10.1002/jmv.27898 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:111027971 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:12.09.2022
Views:971
Downloads:228
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Journal of medical virology
Shortened title:J. med. virol.
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:1096-9071
COBISS.SI-ID:512820505 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:SARS-CoV-2, bris nazofarinksa, slina

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P3-0083
Name:Odnosi parazitskega obstajanja

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:V3-2034
Name:Epidemiologija, diagnostika, zdravljenje in preprečevanje COVID-19

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:H2020
Project number:871029
Name:European Virus Archive GLOBAL
Acronym:EVA-GLOBAL

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Ministry of Health

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back