Introduction: Mammography imaging is the most widespread method for early detection of breast cancer, which is the most common cancer in women in Slovenia. DORA screening program performs mammography imaging and grading of mammography images in accordance with professional guidelines, ensuring a quality mammography image that must be well positioned, adequately lit, high contrast, no artifacts and made with the lowest radiation dose. These parameters are interrelated and affect each other. By
using compression, we reduce the thickness of the breast, increasing the contrast and spatial resolution, reducing the risk of artifacts, and patient receives the lowest radiation
dose.Purpose: The purpose is to collect and compare data on compression and breast thickness in patients imaged in DORA screening program during different visits, between
different mammography machines, between institutions and radiological engineers. Methods: In the study, we used a retrospective method with secondary data analysis and
captured 2000 patients who participated in mammography imaging in DORA program between 2013 and 2017. We captured and compared data from sequential mammography imaging, on three different mammography machines, in four institutions and 64 radiological engineers. IBM SPSS 26 statistics were used for statistical analysis. Results: The results showed statistical differences between subsequent visits, imaging institutions, mammography machines, and radiological engineers in all mammography imaging projections. We found that radiological engineers can be divided into 3 groups according to the average compression force: the first group with average compression <100 N (14 %), the second group with average compression 100 - 120 N (52 %) and the third group with average compression > 120 N (34 %). Discussion and conclusion: We would recommend the implementation of a standardized mammography imaging protocol with the exact range of compression used for each projection during imaging, taking into account the size of the breast and the patient's pain during the imaging itself. In our opinion, this would optimize mammography imaging within the entire DORA program, help reduce differences in average compression, and allow patients a comparable sequential experience, and potentially greater responsiveness to the DORA prevention program.
|