izpis_h1_title_alt

Odpornost lesa impregniranega z ognjezadrževalnim premazom proti lesnim glivam
ID Krt, Kristjan (Author), ID Humar, Miha (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Kržišnik, Davor (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,88 MB)
MD5: 5B16462E033619525CD2F9E6B35E7D06

Abstract
V zadnjem času opažamo porast uporabe lesa, predvsem v gradbeništvu. Poleg vseh dobrih mehanskih in fizikalnih lastnosti je za les značilna tudi neodpornost proti abiotičnim in biotičnim dejavnikom. Čeprav se les s svojimi naravnimi mehanizmi zaščiti pred visokimi temperaturami, ga moramo kljub vsemu dodatno zaščititi pred gorenjem z uporabo ognjezadrževalnih sredstev, saj je ogenj najhitrejši mehanizem uničevanja lesa. Ker živimo v toplem in vlažnem okolju, obstaja verjetnost, da bo les izpostavljen tudi glivam, zato je pomembno, da uporabljeno ognjezadrževalno sredstvo deluje tudi fungicidno. Kot perspektivno ognjezadrževalno sredstvo se v zadnjem času omenja Burnblock, zato nas je, poleg zaščite proti gorenju in visokim temperaturam, zanimalo njegovo fungicidno ali fungistatično delovanje. Uporabili smo glivi pisana ploskocevka (Trametes versicolor) in navadna tramovka (Gloeophyllum trabeum) ter kasneje primerjali rezultate. Vzorce smo zaščitili s potapljanjem in impregnacijo. Poleg ognjevarnostnih in razkrojnih testov smo izvedli tudi meritve pri navlaževanju v 100 % relativni zračni vlažnosti ter teste v povezavi s hidrofobnostjo vzorcev. Zaščiteni vzorci so se izkazali za manj dovzetne za dodatno navlaževanje in posledično razvoj gliv. Pri ognjevarnostnih testih so se zaščiteni vzorci v primerjavi z nezaščitenimi odnesli bolje predvsem pri obremenitvi z neposrednim plamenom, saj se noben od zaščitenih ni vžgal ali izrazito poškodoval. Razkrojni testi so pokazali, da gliva nezaščitene vzorce prerašča lažje kot zaščitene. Ugotovili smo, da lahko Burnblock uvrstimo med sredstva, ki delujejo tako ognjezadrževalno kot tudi fungicidno.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:les, razkroj, ogenj, glive, zaščita lesa
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[K. Krt]
Year:2022
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-137020 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*843.1
COBISS.SI-ID:109924867 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:29.05.2022
Views:730
Downloads:72
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Performance of wood treated with fire retardant product against wood decay fungi
Abstract:
Recently, we have seen a large increase in the use of wood, especially in construction. Although it has many good mechanical and physical properties, wood is also known for its poor resistance to abiotic and biotic factors. Fire is the fastest destroyer of wood, so we need to take care of fire protection in buildings. In the case of high temperatures, wood naturally takes care of itself with its own mechanisms. Nevertheless, we can further improve its resistance to burning. Because we live in a warm and humid environment, wood is also likely to be exposed to fungi. For this reason, we used Burnblock fire retardant, and were interested whether, in addition to protection against burning and high temperatures, we would also observe a fungicidal or fungistatic effect. In this experiment we used the fungi Trametes versicolor and Gloeophyllum trabeum and then we compared the results. The samples were protected by immersion and impregnation. In addition to fire and deterioration tests, we also performed measurements of humidification in 100% relative air humidity and tests in relation to the hydrophobicity of the samples. The protected specimens have been shown to be less susceptible to additional moistening and consequential fungal development. In fire tests, the protected samples performed better than the unprotected ones, as none of the protected ones caught fire or got severely damaged. The deterioration tests showed that the fungus grew in the unprotected specimens more easily in than the protected ones. In this diploma thesis, we came to the conclusion that Burnblock can be classified as an agent that has both fire retardant fungicidal effects.

Keywords:wood, deterioration, fire, fungi, wood protection

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back