Primerjava čelnega in zalednega testiranja v okolju neprekinjenega testiranja

STERLE, ANDRAŽ (author), Rožanc, Igor (mentor)

V diplomski nalogi smo se osredotočili na primerjavo testiranja na čelnem in zalednem delu sistema. Pregledali in izbrali smo potrebna orodja in tehnologije, s katerimi smo ustvarili testno aplikacijo in ustrezni DevOps cevovod. Pri tem smo se posebej posvetili razlikam in sposobnostim testnih ogrodij na čelnem in zalednem delu sistema. Izbrali smo tista, ki so bila najbolje ocenjena glede na naše kriterije in naše poznavanje teh ogrodij. Nato smo preko cevovoda na testni aplikaciji pognali testne primere in opisali postopek ter delovanje cevovoda. Ob primerjavi rezultatov smo ugotovili, da nam pri testni aplikaciji za polno primerjavo testnih ogrodij in postopkov na čelnem in zalednem delu, primanjkuje primerna zahtevnost in obseg aplikacije. Kljub temu smo prišli do zaključka, da je DevOps cevovod z neprekinjenim testiranjem neprecenljiv za podjetja vseh velikosti, ki razvijajo programsko opremo.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: DevOps, neprekinjeno testiranje, neprekinjena integracija, testi enot, integracijski testi, Jenkins, Docker
• Work type: Bachelor thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
• Organization: FRI - Faculty of Computer and Information Science
• Year: 2022
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-135053
• COBISS.SI-ID: 98328067
• Publication date in RUL: 18.02.2022

STERLE, ANDRAŽ, 2022, Primerjava čelnega in zalednega testiranja v okolju neprekinjenega testiranja [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. [Accessed 14 March 2025]. Retrieved from: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=135053

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: Comparison of frontend and backend testing in a continuous testing environment

Abstract

In this thesis we focused on the comparison of frontend and backend testing. We reviewed and selected the necessary tools and technologies required to create a test application and the appropriate DevOps pipeline. We paid special attention to the differences and capabilities of both frontend and backend test frameworks. We selected the best rated according to our criteria and our knowledge of these frameworks. We then ran the test cases via our pipeline on the test application and described the process and operation of the pipeline. While comparing the results, we found that our test application lacks sufficient complexity and scope for a full comparison of frontend and backend test frameworks and procedures. Nevertheless, we have come to the conclusion that a DevOps pipeline with continuous testing is invaluable for all size companies developing software.

• Keywords: Devops, continuous testing, continuous integration, unit testing, integration testing, Jenkins, Docker