izpis_h1_title_alt

Vpliv kognitivnih bližnjic na odločanje v kazenskem pravu
ID Oreški, Sara (Author), ID Hafner, Miha (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,20 MB)
MD5: F5CD79F6CB9E2E4513D212CBEA81EC3B

Abstract
Magistrsko delo obravnava pomen kognitivnih bližnjic v kazenskem pravu. Kognitivne bližnjice so različni kognitivni mehanizmi, ki nam pomagajo učinkovito sprejemati številne vsakodnevne odločitve. Omogočajo nam hitro, avtomatično odločanje brez pretiranega miselnega napora, ob tem pa se včasih pojavljajo tudi določene napake pristranskosti. Magistrsko delo ugotavlja vpliv kognitivnih bližnjic na odločanje v kazenskem postopku, kjer je nepristranskost sojenja ena bistvenih prvin in velja, da se odločitve sprejemajo premišljeno, racionalno in nepristransko. Tega se loti s splošnim pregledom značilnosti posameznih kognitivnih bližnjic in z njimi povezanih napak pristranskosti, ki se sistematično pojavljajo pri odločanju posameznikov ter ugotavlja kakšen je njihov vpliv na odločanje sodnikov ter drugih akterjev kazenskega postopka.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:kognitivne bližnjice, napake pristranskosti, pravica do nepristranskega sojenja, kazensko pravo, kazenski postopek
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2021
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-134258 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:93802499 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:04.01.2022
Views:1718
Downloads:134
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The influence of heuristics on decision-making in criminal law
Abstract:
This master's thesis deals with the importance of heuristics in criminal law. Heuristics are cognitive mechanisms that allow us to make quick, automatic judgements without undue mental effort, but can also cause biases at times. The master's thesis identifies the impact of heuristics on decision- making in criminal proceedings, where impartiality of trial is one of the fundamental rights and decisions are considered to be made thoughtfully, rationally and impartially. This is addressed by a general overview of the characteristics of different heuristics and related cognitive biases that systematically occur in the decision-making processes of individuals and then identifies their influence on judges and other subjects in criminal proceedings.

Keywords:heuristics, cognitive biases, the right to a fair trial, criminal law, criminal procedure

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back