izpis_h1_title_alt

Odziv geodetskih instrumentov GNSS na motenje z oddajnikom preletnega signala L1
ID Dimc, Franc (Author), ID Pavlovčič Prešeren, Polona (Author), ID Bažec, Matej (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,95 MB)
MD5: 1E6AB4968067CBD173BFAC27C9DE5516

Abstract
V prispevku predstavljamo rezultate testa ranljivosti geodetskih sprejemnikov GNSS ob namernem motenju signala v frekvenčnem področju L1 tehnologije GPS (angl. Global Positioning System). Preizkusili smo odziv devetih sprejemnikov GNSS različnih proizvajalcev, in sicer Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc. in Javad GNSS Inc. Praktični preizkus je bil zasnovan na statičnih in kinematičnih motnjah signalov. Statične motnje z mirujočim motilnikom na različnih oddaljenostih od sprejemnikov (od 10 do 160 metrov) so trajale večkrat zaporedoma po tri minute. Za kratkotrajne kinematične motnje smo namestili motilnik v vozilo, ki se je testnemu območju približevalo z različnimi hitrostmi. Analiza različnih scenarijev je pokazala, da so motilniki v nekaterih situacijah onemogočili sprejem signalov s satelitov GPS, medtem ko so se sprejemniki na motnje signalov GLONASS odzvali različno. Ker med meritvami julija 2019 Galileo ni deloval kot predvideno, smo v študijo vključili le GPS in GLONASS. Geodetski instrumenti GNSS so se na motenje signala odzvali z zmanjšanjem razmerja med signalom in šumom (angl. signal-to-noise ratio % SNR) in bodisi s popolno nezmožnostjo določitve položaja bodisi z nepravilnim izračunom faznih neznank (inicializacijo) ter posledično nepravilno določitvijo položaja. Vzrok popolne nezmožnosti sprejema signala najbolj pripisujemo bližini motilnika, za nepravilno kodno in/ali fazno določitev položaja pa tudi trajanju motenja.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:GNSS, namerno motenje signala, motilnik L1, prekinitev signala, razmerje signal-šum
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Article acceptance date:12.02.2021
Publication date:14.05.2021
Year:2021
Number of pages:Str. 189-204
Numbering:Letn. 65, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-132755 This link opens in a new window
UDC:528.28:528.5:655.023
ISSN on article:0351-0271
DOI:10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:69437443 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:02.11.2021
Views:679
Downloads:146
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Geodetski vestnik. glasilo Zveze geodetov Slovenije
Shortened title:Geod. vestn.
Publisher:Zveza geodetov Slovenije
ISSN:0351-0271
COBISS.SI-ID:5091842 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Operation of geodetic GNSS instruments under chirp signal L1 jamming
Abstract:
This paper presents the results of a vulnerability test of several geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers in case of intentional signal interference in the frequency L1 for GPS (Global Positioning System). Nine instruments from different manufacturers (i.e., Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc., Javad GNSS) were tested. The test was based on static and kinematic jamming. A static scenario with three-minute interruptions was followed by experiments with a stationary jammer located at distances from 10 m to 160 m from the receivers. For short-term kinematic interference, the jammer was installed in the vehicle, which passed the GNSS instruments at different speeds. An analysis of different scenarios showed that the jammer interrupted GPS but not GLONASS signals in certain situations. Since Galileo was not nominally operational at the time of the July 2019 measurements, only GPS and GLONASS were eligible for the study. The geodetic GNSS instruments reacted to the interruptions with a decreased signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and either with a complete inability to determine the code/phase position or with an incorrect calculation of phase ambiguities (initialization), which also affected the quality of the positioning. The proximity of the jammer played the most significant role in the complete inability to receive the signal; however, for the incorrect positioning longer duration of jamming was also a reason.

Keywords:GNSS, intentional signal interference, jammer L1, signal interruptions, signal-to-noise ratio

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P2-0227
Name:Geoinformacijska infrastruktura in trajnostni prostorski razvoj Slovenije

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P2-0394
Name:Modeliranje in simulacije v prometu in pomorstvu

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back