izpis_h1_title_alt

Figurativni jezik in afazija : diplomsko delo
ID Strel, Karmen (Author), ID Perenič, Urška (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (572,53 KB)
MD5: DEC56E6535F0F7766914262C41657E09

Abstract
Diplomsko delo kritično pregleda strokovno literaturo in študije s področja razumevanja figurativnega jezika – metafor in idiomov – pri osebah z afazijo. Razložiti skuša kontradiktornosti v razlagah in poiskati čim boljši odgovor, kako pri osebah z afazijo dejansko poteka (ne)razumevanje figurativnega jezika. Odgovor se nakazuje v dvojnem procesnem modelu razumevanja, ki temelji na (ne)avtomatiziranosti in pravi, da naj bi osebe z (Brocovo) afazijo razumele avtomatizirane (figurativne) izraze, medtem ko naj bi imele pri neavtomatiziranih težave. Še posebej velike težave naj bi se pojavile pri razumevanju za posameznika nekonvencionalnih oz. neavtomatiziranih figurativnih izrazov, sestavljenih iz ožjih semantičnih polj. Ob koncu se izpostavi potreba po empiričnem preverjanju hipoteze.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:figurativni jezik, metafora, idiom, razumevanje, afazija
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[K. Strel]
Year:2021
Number of pages:37 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-130003 This link opens in a new window
UDC:81\'373.612:81\'234.2
COBISS.SI-ID:77478915 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:10.09.2021
Views:910
Downloads:130
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Figurative language and aphasia
Abstract:
The bachelor’s thesis critically reviews academic literature and studies in the field of understanding figurative language – metaphors and idioms – in people with aphasia. It tries to explain contradictions in the interpretations, and answer the question, how the (mis)understanding of figurative language actually happens in people with aphasia. The answer is indicated in a dual-processing model of understanding, which is based on (non)automation and it shows that people with (Broca's) aphasia should be able to understand automated (figurative) expressions and have difficulty comprehending non-automated expressions. An individual is expected to face major difficulties understanding unconventional or non-automated figurative expressions comprised of narrower semantic fields. Finally, the need for the empirical verification of the hypothesis is pointed out.

Keywords:figurative language, metaphor, idiom, understanding, aphasia

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back