Introduction: In December 2019 there was an outbreak of a new virus called SARS-CoV-2 which was first noticed in Slovenia in March 2020. Purpose: We wanted to present the epidemic dynamics and find the breaking points on individual time curves connected with the COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia, and thus determine the key elements that influenced the course of the COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia. Methods: For the theoretical part we studied Slovenian and foreign literature in databases, newspaper articles and other professional websites but literature was partly searched also with a snowball method. For the empirical research we obtained information between March 2020 and March 2021 from the COVID-19 Sledilnik Website. Information on safety measures was received from governmental website GOV.SI, information on the mobility of people was found on Google and letters on the methodology of testing were sent from the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia. Based on freely available data, graphs of epidemiological curves and mobility curves were made. They were described, and the breaking points were indicated and collected in common timeline, creating a more accurate analysis of the received results and showing densifications and dilutions of curve breaks. Taking protective measures' dates and changes in testing methodology dates were included. Results: It was discovered that the stay at home curve was just the opposite of the chores and job mobility curve. The more people stayed at home, the less chores and leaving for work were noticed. After the end of epidemic life almost turned to normal, in winter, however, the second wave came with an even bigger number of the infected, hospitalized and dead. The government measures, mainly connected with social distancing and self-protective behaviour had a major impact on the speed of spreading the infection. It turned out that the temporary mitigation of some measures and consequently more socializing was reflected by the increase in the number of confirmed cases. In the beginning of the new year the curve of confirmed cases already showed the impact of vaccination. Discussion and conclusion: It was realised that in the first wave people responded to the seriousness of the situation and observed the valid measures more than in the second wave.
|