izpis_h1_title_alt

Testing the performance of multi-frequency low-cost GNSS receivers and antennas
ID Hamza, Veton (Author), ID Stopar, Bojan (Author), ID Sterle, Oskar (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,62 MB)
MD5: 6D2B0EB3D8FF92D8E3225BA99C0BE7BA
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/2029 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) low-cost multi-frequency receivers are argued as an alternative to geodetic receivers for many applications. Calibrated low-cost antennas recently became available on the market making low-cost instruments more comparable with geodetic ones. The main goal of this research was to evaluate the noise of low-cost GNSS receivers, to compare the positioning quality from different types of low-cost antennas, and to analyze the positioning differences between low-cost and geodetic instruments. The results from a zero baseline test indicated that the u-blox multi-frequency receiver, namely, ZED-F9P, had low noise that was at the sub-millimeter level. To analyze the impact of the antennas in the obtained coordinates, a short baseline test was applied. Both tested uncalibrated antennas (Tallysman TW3882 and Survey) demonstrated satisfactory positioning performance. The Tallysman antenna was more accurate in the horizontal position determination, and the difference from the true value was only 0.1 mm; while, for the Survey antenna, the difference was 1.0 mm. For the ellipsoid height, the differences were 0.3 and 0.6 mm for the Survey and Tallysman antennas, respectively. The comparison of low-cost receivers with calibrated low-cost antennas (Survey Calibrated) and geodetic instruments proved better performance for the latter. The geodetic GNSS instruments were more accurate than the low-cost instruments, and the precision of the estimated coordinates from the geodetic network was also greater. Low-cost GNSS instruments were not at the same level as the geodetic ones; however, considering their cost, they demonstrated excellent performance that is sufficiently appropriate for various geodetic applications.

Language:English
Keywords:GNSS, low-cost instruments, geodetic instruments, comparison, sessions
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2021
Number of pages:16 str.
Numbering:Vol. 21, iss. 6, art. 2029
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-127409 This link opens in a new window
UDC:528(497.4)
ISSN on article:1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s21062029 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:55332867 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:04.06.2021
Views:734
Downloads:133
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Sensors
Shortened title:Sensors
Publisher:MDPI
ISSN:1424-8220
COBISS.SI-ID:10176278 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:12.03.2021

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:GNSS, geodetski instrumenti, ekonomski vidik, primerjava

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P2-0227
Name:Geoinformacijska infrastruktura in trajnostni prostorski razvoj Slovenije

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back