Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Testing the performance of multi-frequency low-cost GNSS receivers and antennas
ID
Hamza, Veton
(
Author
),
ID
Stopar, Bojan
(
Author
),
ID
Sterle, Oskar
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(3,62 MB)
MD5: 6D2B0EB3D8FF92D8E3225BA99C0BE7BA
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/2029
Image galllery
Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) low-cost multi-frequency receivers are argued as an alternative to geodetic receivers for many applications. Calibrated low-cost antennas recently became available on the market making low-cost instruments more comparable with geodetic ones. The main goal of this research was to evaluate the noise of low-cost GNSS receivers, to compare the positioning quality from different types of low-cost antennas, and to analyze the positioning differences between low-cost and geodetic instruments. The results from a zero baseline test indicated that the u-blox multi-frequency receiver, namely, ZED-F9P, had low noise that was at the sub-millimeter level. To analyze the impact of the antennas in the obtained coordinates, a short baseline test was applied. Both tested uncalibrated antennas (Tallysman TW3882 and Survey) demonstrated satisfactory positioning performance. The Tallysman antenna was more accurate in the horizontal position determination, and the difference from the true value was only 0.1 mm; while, for the Survey antenna, the difference was 1.0 mm. For the ellipsoid height, the differences were 0.3 and 0.6 mm for the Survey and Tallysman antennas, respectively. The comparison of low-cost receivers with calibrated low-cost antennas (Survey Calibrated) and geodetic instruments proved better performance for the latter. The geodetic GNSS instruments were more accurate than the low-cost instruments, and the precision of the estimated coordinates from the geodetic network was also greater. Low-cost GNSS instruments were not at the same level as the geodetic ones; however, considering their cost, they demonstrated excellent performance that is sufficiently appropriate for various geodetic applications.
Language:
English
Keywords:
GNSS
,
low-cost instruments
,
geodetic instruments
,
comparison
,
sessions
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2021
Number of pages:
16 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 21, iss. 6, art. 2029
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-127409
UDC:
528(497.4)
ISSN on article:
1424-8220
DOI:
10.3390/s21062029
COBISS.SI-ID:
55332867
Publication date in RUL:
04.06.2021
Views:
1065
Downloads:
146
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Sensors
Shortened title:
Sensors
Publisher:
MDPI
ISSN:
1424-8220
COBISS.SI-ID:
10176278
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:
12.03.2021
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
GNSS
,
geodetski instrumenti
,
ekonomski vidik
,
primerjava
Projects
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
P2-0227
Name:
Geoinformacijska infrastruktura in trajnostni prostorski razvoj Slovenije
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back