Soil erosion modelling : a bibliometric analysis
ID Bezak, Nejc (Author), ID Mikoš, Matjaž (Author), et al.

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (15,11 MB)
MD5: 2BAD918822DFE74834FC4D2DBAE270F3
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935121003819 This link opens in a new window

Soil erosion can present a major threat to agriculture due to loss of soil, nutrients, and organic carbon. Therefore, soil erosion modelling is one of the steps used to plan suitable soil protection measures and detect erosion hotspots. A bibliometric analysis of this topic can reveal research patterns and soil erosion modelling characteristics that can help identify steps needed to enhance the research conducted in this field. Therefore, a detailed bibliometric analysis, including investigation of collaboration networks and citation patterns, should be conducted. The updated version of the Global Applications of Soil Erosion Modelling Tracker (GASEMT) database contains information about citation characteristics and publication type. Here, we investigated the impact of the number of authors, the publication type and the selected journal on the number of citations. Generalized boosted regression tree (BRT) modelling was used to evaluate the most relevant variables related to soil erosion modelling. Additionally, bibliometric networks were analysed and visualized. This study revealed that the selection of the soil erosion model has the largest impact on the number of publication citations, followed by the modelling scale and the publication’s CiteScore. Some of the other GASEMT database attributes such as model calibration and validation have negligible influence on the number of citations according to the BRT model. Although it is true that studies that conduct calibration, on average, received around 30% more citations, than studies where calibration was not performed. Moreover, the bibliographic coupling and citation networks show a clear continental pattern, although the co-authorship network does not show the same characteristics. Therefore, soil erosion modellers should conduct even more comprehensive review of past studies and focus not just on the research conducted in the same country or continent. Moreover, when evaluating soil erosion models, an additional focus should be given to field measurements, model calibration, performance assessment and uncertainty of modelling results. The results of this study indicate that these GASEMT database attributes had smaller impact on the number of citations, according to the BRT model, than anticipated, which could suggest that these attributes should be given additional attention by the soil erosion modelling community. This study provides a kind of bibliographic benchmark for soil erosion modelling research papers as modellers can estimate the influence of their paper.

Keywords:soil erosion modelling, research impact, collaboration network, systematic literature review, citation analysis, participatory network
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Number of pages:16 str.
Numbering:Vol. 197, art. 111087
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-127157 This link opens in a new window
ISSN on article:0013-9351
DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111087 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:58619139 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.05.2021
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Environmental research. multidisciplinary journal of environmental sciences, ecology, and public health
Shortened title:Environ. res.
Publisher:Academic Press
COBISS.SI-ID:3951911 This link opens in a new window


License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.


Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P2-0180
Name:Vodarstvo in geotehnika: orodja in metode za analize in simulacije procesov ter razvoj tehnologij

Funder:FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.
Project number:CDL-CTTRI-97-ARH/2018 - REF.191-97-ARH/2018

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:CESAM
Project number:UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute
Project number:2019002820004

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Taiwan, Ministry of Science and Technology
Project number:MOST 109-2121-M-027-001

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections: