izpis_h1_title_alt

Usklajena merila sprejemljive poškodovanosti gozdnih tal - preverjanje ustreznosti med gozdarskimi strokovnjaki
ID Poje, Anton (Author), ID Mihelič, Matevž (Author), ID Krč, Janez (Artist), ID Leban, Vasja (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit https://doi.org/10.20315/ASetL.124.4 This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (970,42 KB)
MD5: 009A523152DBE587B4BF1FDF752691E6

Abstract
Splošno veljavna, predvsem pa v stroki sprejeta merila sprejemljive poškodovanosti tal po gozdni proizvodnji so predpogoj za učinkovito varovanje gozdnih tal in objektiven nadzor nad kakovostjo izvedbe gozdnih del. V raziskavi znotraj gozdarske stroke smo preverili sprejemljivost meril, ki so jih na osnovi dosedanjih raziskav predlagali Poje in sodelavci (2019). Anketiranje je bilo opravljeno na 35. Gozdarskih študijskih dnevih, kjer je na anketo odgovorilo 62 udeležencev iz različnih ustanov. Rezultati ankete so pokazali, da so usklajena merila strožja od predlaganih ter da se ocene po posameznih kazalnikih znotraj meril razlikujejo med deležniki. Po predlogu usklajenih meril je dopustna odprtost z vlakami 192 m/ha, s sečnimi potmi pa dodatnih 193 m/ha. Največja globina kolesnic na vlakah ne sme presegati 30 cm, na sečnih poteh pa 20 cm. Največja globina kolesnic na 90 % dolžine vseh sečnih poti na delovišču naj ne presega 10 cm. Tudi na osnovi rezultatov drugih študij se zdi predlog usklajenih meril smiseln in primeren s tehnološkega, ekonomskega in ekološkega vidika. Pred uvajanjem usklajenih meril v prakso je poleg njihovega preverjanja na terenu in morebitnega ponovnega usklajevanja treba nujno razviti metodo za ocenjevanje poškodovanosti.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:pridobivanje lesa, anketa, merila sprejemljive poškodovanosti tal, poškodba tal
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2021
Number of pages:Str. 43-54
Numbering:[Št.] 124
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-125591 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*114:630*46(045)=163.6
ISSN on article:2335-3112
DOI:10.20315/ASetL.124.4 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:57405187 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.03.2021
Views:1029
Downloads:203
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Acta Silvae et Ligni
Publisher:Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, založba Silva Slovenica, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za lesarstvo
ISSN:2335-3112
COBISS.SI-ID:266761216 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Harmonised criteria for acceptable forest soil damage - verifying suitability among forestry professionals
Abstract:
Generally applicable and professionally applied criteria for acceptable soil damage after forest operations are a prerequisite for efficient forest soil protection and objective control of the quality of forest operations. This research took the form of a survey conducted among forestry experts to examine the acceptability of the criteria proposed by Poje et al. (2019) on the basis of previous studies. The survey was conducted on the 35th Forestry Study Days Conference and involved 62 respondents from different institutions. The results of the survey showed that the harmonised criteria are stricter than the proposed criteria and that the assessments by individual indicators within the criteria vary between stakeholders. According to the proposed harmonised criteria, a density of 192 m/ha with skid trails and an additional 193 m/ha with harvester trails is allowed. The maximum rut depth in skid and harvester trails shall not exceed 30 cm and 20 cm, respectively. The maximum rut depth on 90% of the length of all harvester trails at the logging location shall not exceed 10 cm. Based on the results of other studies, the proposal for harmonised criteria also appears to be reasonable and appropriate from a technological, economic and environmental point of view. Before the harmonised criteria are introduced in practice, a method for assessing soil damage needs to be developed, in addition to on-site verification of the respective criteria and their possible reorientation.

Keywords:questionnaire, forest operations, soil damage, criteria for acceptable soil damage

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:V4-1624
Name:Vpliv strojne sečnje na gozd in določitev meril za njeno uporabo

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back