izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava subjektivnega vrednotenja dela pri mladih slovenskih in srbskih managerjih : magistrsko delo
ID Zukal Banjac, Marta (Author), ID Bajec, Boštjan (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (657,76 KB)
MD5: 7BBA02411555522A2A9CB26AA4A9639F

Abstract
Managerji običajno ocenjujejo svojo uspešnost posredno, na podlagi rezultatov svojih podrejenih in izpolnjevanja organizacijskih ciljev. Vendar pa je ocenjevanje managerjeve učinkovitosti bolj zapleteno in redko so na voljo jasno opredeljeni kriteriji. Na podlagi raziskave sta F. Ismagilova in G. Mirolyubova (2012) ustvarili model subjektivnih kriterijev nadzora delovne učinkovitosti. Njun model je sestavljen iz 40 kriterijev delovne učinkovitosti, razdeljenih v dve skupini po 20: lažje merljivi kriteriji (absolutni ali relativni) – temeljijo na delovnih zahtevah; in težje merljivi kriteriji (eksplicitni ali implicitni) – temeljijo na poklicnih izkušnjah. Na podlagi tega modela je bil ustvarjen vprašalnik za merjenje pogostosti uporabe subjektivnih kriterijev vrednotenja managerskega dela, ki smo ga potem uporabili v vzporednih raziskavah, ki se jih je izvajalo v Srbiji, Sloveniji in Rusiji. Vključen je bil širok nabor demografskih spremenljivk, da bi raziskali, ali obstajajo razlike med managerji v pogostosti uporabe kriterijev glede na njihov spol, starost, izobrazbo (splošno in s področja managementa), število podrejenih, značilnosti organizacije, v kateri delajo (javni oziroma zasebni sektor, velikost in lastništvo, sektor, v katerem posluje). Cilj naše študije je bil ugotoviti pojavnost in pogostost uporabe subjektivnih kriterijev vrednotenja dela, ki jih uporabljajo mladi srbski managerji, ter rezultate primerjati s pogostostjo uporabe kriterijev mladih slovenskih managerjev. Ugotovili smo, da je med srbskimi managerji enako razširjena uporaba lažje in težje merljivih kriterijev. Statistično pomembne razlike v pogostosti uporabe vseh, lažje in težje merljivih kriterijev med srbskimi managerji so se izkazale le glede na starost, glede na ostale demografske spremenljivke so se statistično pomembne razlike v pogostosti uporabe izkazale le na nekaterih od kriterijev. Ugotovili smo statistično pomembne razlike med slovenskimi in srbskimi managerji – srbski managerji v primerjavi s slovenskimi pogosteje uporabljajo vse kriterije in tudi lažje merljive kriterije subjektivnega vrednotenja dela. Med slovenskimi in srbskimi managerji nismo ugotovili statistično pomembne razlike v pogostosti uporabe težje merljivih kriterijev subjektivnega vrednotenja dela.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:managerji, delovna učinkovitost, kriteriji ocenjevanja, subjektivne mere, Slovenija, Srbija
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Zukal Banjac]
Year:2021
Number of pages:52 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-125508 This link opens in a new window
UDC:[159.9:005.336.1]-057.17(497.4)(497.11)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:59125251 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.03.2021
Views:726
Downloads:70
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison between young Slovenian and Serbian managers according to subjective work efficiency criteria
Abstract:
Managers tend to assess their effectiveness indirectly based on the results of their subordinates and fulfilling the organizational goals. However, assessing manager's efficiency is more complex and there are rarely clearly defined criteria available. Based on their research F. Ismagilova and G. Mirolyubova (2012) created the Model of subjective work efficiency control criteria. Their model consists of 40 work efficiency criteria, split into two groups of 20: easily measurable criteria (absolute or relative) – based on job requirements; and difficult to measure criteria (explicit or implicit) – based on professional experience. The questionnaire measuring the criteria usage prevalence among the participating managers was created based on this model in order to be used in parallel studies in Serbia, Slovenia and Russia. A wide range of demographic variables was included to explore whether criteria usage prevalence differences exist among managers based on their gender, age, education (general and management-related), number of subordinates, characteristics of the organization they work in (public / private sector, size and ownership, sector in which it operates). The aim of this study is to identify work efficiency criteria usage prevalence among young Serbian managers and to compare it with the usage prevalence among young Slovenian managers. We found that among Serbian managers use of easily measurable and difficult to measure criteria is equally prevalent. Age is the only variable for which statistically significant differences among Serbian managers were found on the total, easily measurable and difficult to measure criteria usage prevalence. For the other demographic variables, statistically significant differences in usage prevalence were found only in regards to some of the criteria groups. Statistically significant differences were found between Slovenian and Serbian managers – Serbian managers use easy to measure criteria more frequently and they tend to use more subjective work efficiency criteria overall comparing to the Slovenians. Comparing the difficult to measure subjective work efficiency criteria use prevalence, no statistically significant difference was found between Slovenian and Serbian managers.

Keywords:managers, work efficiency, evaluation criteria, subjective measures, Slovenia, Serbia

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back