izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava mnenja učencev in staršev o pomenu vsebin s področja gospodinjstva v sodobni družbi
ID Bernot Sotenšek, Mojca (Author), ID Lovšin Kozina, Francka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/6629/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
V magistrskem delu je predstavljeno mnenje učencev in staršev o pomenu vsebin s področja gospodinjstva v sodobnem času. Število ur, namenjenih poučevanju vsebin gospodinjstva, se je z uvedbo devetletne osnovne šole zmanjšalo. Uvedla sta se dva izbirna predmeta s področja prehrane, in sicer sodobna priprava hrane (v nadaljevanju SPH) in načini prehranjevanja (v nadaljevanju NP), ki pa ju učenci izberejo v sedmem ali osmem ali devetem razredu le, če želijo. Zaradi načina življenja sodobnih družin se večina učencev doma ne nauči osnovnih gospodinjskih opravil. Namen magistrskega dela je ugotoviti mnenje učencev šestega in devetega razreda osnovne šole ter njihovih staršev o pomenu vsebin s področja gospodinjstva v 21. stoletju (obveznega predmeta gospodinjstvo in izbirnih predmetov s področja gospodinjstva). Izvedeti sem želela, ali se jim znanje, ki ga pridobijo v času šolanja, zdi pomembno in uporabno. Prav tako sem želela ugotoviti, ali se jim zdijo prej omenjeni predmeti enakovredni ostalim predmetom devetletne osnovne šole. Potrebne podatke sem zbrala na osnovi vprašalnika, ki so ga izpolnjevali učenci šestega in devetega razreda osnovne šole ter njihovi starši. Vzorec je bil izbran priložnostno. V raziskavi je sodelovalo 141 učencev, od tega je bilo 76 učencev šestega razreda in 65 učencev devetega razreda. Sodelovalo je tudi 118 staršev, in sicer 75 staršev učencev šestega razreda in 43 staršev učencev devetega razreda. Rezultati so pokazali, da tako učenci kot starši ocenjujejo, da so znanja in veščine, ki jih učenci pridobijo pri pouku gospodinjstva in izbirnih predmetov s področja gospodinjstva, pomembna ter da bi moral predmet gospodinjstvo postati obvezen predmet za vse učence tudi v zadnji triadi devetletne osnovne šole. Tako starši kot učenci ocenjujejo predmet gospodinjstvo enakovreden ostalim predmetom. Podatke sem pridobila s pomočjo spletne ankete in jih računalniško obdelala. Uporabila sem programe Microsoft Excel in SPSS program (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). Prav tako sem uporabila ustrezne statistične izračune in rezultate tudi opisno obrazložila. Uporabljena je bila deskriptivna in inferenčna statistika. Eden od ciljev magistrskega dela je bil tudi raziskati, kako pouk na področju znanj iz gospodinjstva poteka v skandinavskih državah in kakšen pomen dajejo tem znanjem, kajti znano je namreč, da je izobraževalni sistem v teh državah, še zlasti na Finskem, znan kot eden boljših v tem trenutku. Glede na dostopne podatke se slovenski in finski šolski sistem pravzaprav ne razlikujeta bistveno, ju je pa vseeno težko primerjati, saj imajo Finci popolnoma drugačne prioritete in vrednote kot Slovenci, njihovo šolstvo pa je dosti manj storilnostno naravnano, velik poudarek dajejo sodelovanju med teorijo in prakso, v učni proces pa v veliki meri vključujejo tudi lokalno okolje. Tako na Finskem, Švedskem kot Norveškem namenjajo predmetu gospodinjstvo v obvezni osnovni šoli več ur, prav tako pa znanja in veščine, za katera želijo, da jih učenci usvojijo, mnogo bolj povezujejo tudi z ostalimi šolskimi predmeti ali predmetnimi področji. V Sloveniji bi bilo na področju gospodinjstva smiselno razmisliti o tem, da bi se predmet umestil kot obvezni za vse učence tudi v zadnji triadi osnovne šole, vsebine predmeta pa bi bilo potrebno obvezno dopolniti z nekaterimi vsebinami, s katerimi se učenci v osnovni šoli ne seznanijo, obstoječe vsebine pa prerazporediti glede njihove zahtevnosti razumevanja in dojemanja v višje razrede osnovne šole.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:osnovna šola
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Year:2021
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-125309 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:54261763 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:22.03.2021
Views:871
Downloads:156
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparing the opinions of students and parents on the importance of home economics in today's society
Abstract:
The master's thesis presents the opinion of students and parents on the importance of content in the field of household in modern times. The number of hours devoted to teaching household contents has decreased with the introduction of a nine-year primary school. Two elective courses in the field of nutrition were introduced, namely Modern food preparation (hereinafter SPH) and Nutrition methods (hereinafter NP), which students choose only if they want in the seventh or eighth or ninth grade. Due to the lifestyle of modern families, most students do not learn basic household chores at home. The purpose of the master's thesis is to determine the opinion of sixth and ninth grade primary school students and their parents on the importance of content in the field of home economics in the 21st century (compulsory subject of home economics and elective subjects in the field of home economics). I wanted to find out if the knowledge they acquire during schooling seems important and useful to them. I also wanted to find out if they found the aforementioned school subject equivalent to the other subjects of a nine-year elementary school. I collected the necessary data on the basis of a questionnaire filled out by sixth and ninth grade elementary school students and their parents. The sample was selected at random. The study involved 141 students, of which 76 were sixth-graders and 65 were ninth-graders. 118 parents also participated, namely 75 parents of sixth grade students and 43 parents of ninth grade students. The results showed that both students and parents consider that the knowledge and skills that students acquire in home economics and electives are important, and that the subject of home economics should become a compulsory subject for all students in the last triad of nine-year primary school. Both parents and students rate the subject of home economics as equivalent to other subjects. I obtained the data with the help of an online survey, and processed it by computer. I used Microsoft Excel and the SPSS program (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). I also used the relevant statistical calculations and explained the results descriptively. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used. One of the aims of the master's thesis was to investigate how teaching in the field of household skills takes place in the Scandinavian countries and what importance they attach to this knowledge, since it is widely known that the education system in these countries, especially in Finland, is known to be as one of the best at present. According to the available data, the Slovene and Finnish school systems do not really differ significantly, but they are still difficult to compare, as Finns have completely different priorities and values than Slovenes, and their education is much less performance-oriented, with great emphasis on cooperation between theory and practice. They also largely involve the local environment in the learning process. In Finland, Sweden and Norway, they spend several hours in the subject of home economics in compulsory primary school, and they also connect the knowledge and skills that they want students to acquire much more with other school subjects or subject areas. In the field of home economics in Slovenia, it would clearly make sense to consider placing the subject as compulsory for all students in the last triad of primary school, and the content of the subject should be supplemented with some content that students in primary school do not get acquainted with and redistribute existing content in terms of their complexity of understanding and perception in the upper grades of primary school.

Keywords:primary school

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back