izpis_h1_title_alt

Bibliometrijska analiza objavljanja raziskovalnih skupin na področju gozdarstva, lesarstva in papirništva : doktorska disertacija
Peteh, Maja (Author), Južnič, Primož (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, Bartol, Tomaž (Co-mentor), Vilar, Polona (Thesis defence commission member), Demšar, Franci (Thesis defence commission member)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,25 MB)
MD5: 00A95DFC8BBC1ED777067457C95BE7BB

Abstract
Doktorska naloga ugotavlja značilnosti objavljanja na področju gozdarstva, lesarstva in papirništva. Vsa tri področja so v šifrantu ARRS del biotehniških ved. Značilnosti so bile analizirane na podlagi objav vseh trenutno aktivnih raziskovalnih skupin na izbranih področij (n = 15) in v obdobju 2005-2017. Ustanove se organizacijsko močno razlikujejo (samostojne raziskovalne organizacije, del fakultete ali del podjetja), kar se kaže tudi v rezultatih. Podatki o objavah so bili pridobljeni iz sistema SICRIS in treh citatnih indeksov zbirke Web of Science (WoS), ki izračunavajo faktor vpliva. Zajem podatkov omejuje več metodoloških zagat vezanih na spreminjaje sestave raziskovalnih skupin in neenotne navedbe afiliacij avtorjev objav indeksiranih v zbirki WoS. Rezultati dokazujejo razlike med izbranimi raziskovalnimi skupinami, raziskovalnimi organizacijami in med področji gozdarstva, lesarstva in papirništva. Razlike v velikosti skupin pričakovano rezultirajo v količini in vrstah objav. Na to pa bistveno vpliva predvsem vrsta raziskovalne organizacije in delež njene raziskovalne, pedagoške in podjetniške dejavnosti. Objave znanstvenih člankov avtorjev iz področja gozdarstva in indeksiranih v zbirki WoS so po kategorizaciji zbirke WoS, ki se uporablja v kontekstu harmonizacije kategorij za potrebe OECD enakovredno zastopane v revijah kmetijskih in naravoslovnih ved. Objave s področja lesarstva so najpogostejše v revijah s področja tehniških in tehnoloških ved, nezanemarljiv delež objav pa je tudi v revijah s področij naravoslovnih in kmetijskih ved. Objave s področja papirništva so večinoma objavljene v revijah tehniških ved. Za promocijo raziskovalnega dela in raziskovalne organizacije raziskovalci premalo uporabljajo sodobne komunikacije poti in družbena omrežja, slabo vzdržujejo mednarodne identifikatorje za ureditev enotnega osebnega imena (WoS Researcher ID, Scopus Author Identifier, ORCID), podatkov o afiliaciji ne navajajo enotno in pozabljajo na zahteve financerja po njegovi navedbi v objavi. Rezultati so uporabni za razvoj vseh vpletenih v procesu znanstvene komunikacije in evalvacije - to so raziskovalci, založniki, financerji, ocenjevalci raziskovalnega dela in knjižničarji.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:bibliometrija, gozdarstvo, lesarstvo, papirništvo, raziskovalna politika, vrednotenje raziskovalnih dosežkov, znanstvena komunikacija, diseminacija informacij
Work type:Dissertation (m)
Tipology:2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Year:2020
Publisher:[M. Peteh]
Number of pages:159 str.
UDC:001.891:303.424+630+674+676(043.3)=163.6
COBISS.SI-ID:40176387 This link opens in a new window
Views:291
Downloads:101
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Bibliometric analysis of publication of research groups in the fields of forestry, wood and paper Science : doctoral dissertation
Abstract:
The dissertation deals with the identification of publication characteristics in the fields of forestry, wood and paper science. All three fields are considered part of biotechnological sciences according the Slovenian Research Agency classification. The publication characteristics were analyzed on the basis of the publications of all currently active research groups from these fields in Slovenia (n = 15) during the period 2005-2017, which differ significantly depending on the organization (independent research organizations, faculty units or company departments). The publication data were obtained from the SICRIS system and three Web of Science (WoS) citation indexes. Data collection was limited by several methodological dilemmas related to changes in the composition of research groups over the years and inconsistent listing of affiliation in the articles indexed in the WoS. The results demonstrate differences between the selected research groups, research organizations and selected fields. There are major differences in the size of the groups, which is logically reflected in the number of publications. The type of research organization and the proportion of its research, teaching and entrepreneurial activity have a significant influence on the number and type of publications. Scientific articles by researchers in the field of forestry indexed in the WoS categories of agricultural and natural sciences are equally represented. The most common WoS categorization in the field of wood sciences is technical and technological sciences. However, a considerable proportion of publications are assigned to natural and agricultural sciences. In the field of paper sciences, journals are usually classified in the WoS category of technical sciences. When promoting their research work and research organization, researchers make insufficient use of modern communication channels and social networks, use too few international identifiers for the registration of personal names (e.g. WoS Researcher ID, Scopus Author Identifier, ORCID), do not provide uniform information about their affiliation and overlook the requirements for naming funding organizations. The results are useful for all those involved in the process of research and research communication: researchers, publishers, funding organizations and evaluators of research, and librarians.

Keywords:bibliometrics, forestry, wood technology, paper technology, research policy, research evaluation, scientific communication, dissemination of information

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back