Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Interpreting environmental impacts in building design - application of a comparative assertion method in the context of the EPD scheme for building products
ID
Božiček, David
(
Author
),
ID
Kunič, Roman
(
Author
),
ID
Košir, Mitja
(
Author
)
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123399
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,60 MB)
MD5: 54CECAAF429924615884AA0E8397DF3F
Image galllery
Abstract
Due to the profound impact that building sector has on the environment and consequently the sustainability of our society, the evaluation of environmental impacts through life cycle assessment (LCA) should become part of building design. The number of published environmental product declarations (EPDs) is growing, which indicates that they can become valuable tools for building designers to evaluate the environmental performance of construction works. We identified that in the current EPD scheme an important part is missing the results interpretation. In order to evaluate the environmental performance of buildings or their components and elements, the designer is forced to conduct a comparative assertion on a population of alternatives. The paper explores the results interpretation of LCA data in the context of the EPD scheme for building products and presents a comparative assertion method, which could guide designers through the results interpretation step of LCA. The proposed soft comparative assertion method was tested on a sample of external wall assembly alternatives and the results show that it significantly simplifies the LCA results interpretation and enables straightforward decision making. However, the method is not yet a fully functional tool and should be upgraded in order to make the decision process more robust and less subjective. With this paper we wish to encourage further research on the described topic, which is vital in order to add credibility to the EPD scheme as an instrument for lowering the environmental impact of the building sector.
Language:
English
Work type:
Scientific work
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Author Accepted Manuscript
Submitted for review:
03.02.2020
Article acceptance date:
20.07.2020
Publication date:
10.01.2021
Year:
2021
Number of pages:
Str. 1-17
Numbering:
letn. 10 jan., Št. 123399
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-121010
UDC:
699.8
ISSN on article:
0959-6526
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123399
COBISS.SI-ID:
29325059
Publication date in RUL:
28.09.2020
Views:
939
Downloads:
152
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Journal of cleaner production
Shortened title:
J. clean. prod.
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
0959-6526
COBISS.SI-ID:
15470597
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:
The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:
28.09.2020
Projects
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Project number:
C3330-16-529003
Name:
Sustainable and innovative construction of smart buildings
Acronym:
TIGR4smart
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back