izpis_h1_title_alt

Dinamika trga zdravil za zdravljenje sladkorne bolezni tipa 2 v Sloveniji : enovit magistrski študij farmacija
ID Breskvar, Tina (Author), ID Locatelli, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Janžič, Andrej (Co-mentor)

.pdfPDF - Source file, Download (2,12 MB)
MD5: 1C97624B6A449D71E83DD52C88E96A83

Abstract
Sladkorna bolezen je eden izmed največjih svetovnih zdravstvenih problemov, njena prevalenca v svetovnem merilu pa znaša slabih 10 %. V Sloveniji je leta 2015 zdravila za sladkorno bolezen tipa 2 prejemalo nekaj več kot 105000 ljudi. Istega leta se je tako porabilo kar 28,3 milijona evrov za zdravila ter 16,2 milijona evrov za medicinske pripomočke za zdravljenje sladkorne bolezni. Namen našega dela je pregled dinamike trga zdravil za zdravljenje sladkorne bolezni tipa 2 med leti 2006 in 2017, med katere spadajo metformin, sulfonilsečnine, zaviralci dipeptidil peptidaze 4 (DPP-4), glinidi, analogi glukagonu podobnega peptida 1 (GLP-1), zaviralci kotransporterja natrija in glukoze 2 (SGLT-2), zaviralci glukozidaze α in tiazolindioni.Pri nalogi smo uporabili naslednje podatkovne vire: Centralna baza zdravil, Seznam medsebojno zamenljivih zdravil, Podatke o izdanih zdravilih na recept v breme zdravstvenega zavarovanja in Anonimizirano evidenco Zavoda za zdravstveno zavarovanje Slovenije o izdanih zdravilih na recept. Najprej smo opredelili nabor zdravil, ki so bila predpisovana med leti 2006 in 2017. Slednjim smo izračunali tržne deleže na podlagi predpisanih definiranih dnevnih odmerkov. Regulirane in dejanske cene zdravil smo preračunali na predvideno mesečno porabo ter izračunali verižne indekse obojih cen. Ugotovili smo, da so se med leti 2006 in 2015 sicer v največji meri predpisovale sulfonilsečnine, vendar jih je izpodrival metformin, ki ga kot zdravilo prvega izbora priporočajo tudi slovenske smernice za zdravljenje sladkorne bolezni tipa 2. Med sulfonilsečninami je najbolj naraščalo predpisovanje gliklazida, najverjetneje zaradi njegovih blagodejnih učinkov na srčno-žilni sistem. Zaviralci DPP-4 so postali 3. najbolj predpisovana skupina, verjetno zaradi dobrega varnostnega profila, saj ne povzročajo hipoglikemij. Gliptini so namenjeni specifični populaciji sladkornih bolnikov, zato njihov tržni delež ni bil višji od 5 %. Analogi GLP-1 so predstavljali do 2 % porabe, saj gre za drage peptidne učinkovine, ki zahtevajo subkutano aplikacijo. Zaviralci SGLT-2 pa so najnovejše učinkovine, ki so na trg prišle v letu 2014. Njihov tržni delež je po 1 letu znašal približno 1 %. Pri metforminu, sulfonilsečninah in glinidih so padce cen povzročili predvsem prihodi generičnih zdravil, ki so v celotnem obdobju znižali cene med 40 in 70 %. Pri zaviralcih DPP-4, analogih GLP-1 in zaviralcih SGLT-2 so imeli podoben, a manjši učinek, prihodi novih, podobnih učinkovin oziroma kombinacij, ki so povzročile padce cen med 10-40 %. Dejanske cene so bile v povprečju nižje od reguliranih, in sicer je bilo največje odstopanje pri zaviralcih SGLT-2 (cca. 30 %) ter metforminu in glinidih (slabih 20 %). V primeru metformina je bila cena zdravila odvisna od količine učinkovine v enoti farmacevtske oblike, v primeru gliklazida, glimepirida in repaglinida pa ne. V primeru zdravil, ki vsebujejo kombinacijo metformina in drugih učinkovin iz skupine zaviralcev DPP-4 ali SGLT-2, metformin ni imel vpliva na ceno zdravila. Verižni indeksi cen so pokazali splošno padanje tako reguliranih kot dejanskih cen skupin zdravil iz leta v leto, predvsem zaradi prihodov novih generičnih zdravil, podobnih učinkovin ter določitev skupin medsebojno zamenljivih zdravil. Skupine z nižjimi povprečnimi cenami zdravil so bile, z izjemo zaviralcev DPP-4, v glavnem tudi bolj predpisovane.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:dinamika trga regulirane cene dejanske cene tržni deleži sladkorna bolezen tipa 2
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FFA - Faculty of Pharmacy
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[T. Breskvar]
Year:2018
Number of pages:XI, 69 f., I-XVI f. pril.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-120160 This link opens in a new window
UDC:338.5:616.379-008.64(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:4645233 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:16.09.2020
Views:1342
Downloads:174
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Market dynamics of medicines for type 2 diabetes treatment in Slovenia : uniform masterʼs study programme pharmacy
Abstract:
Diabetes is one of the biggest world heath problem with the prevalence of around 10 %. A little more than 105000 people received type 2 diabetes medications in 2015. 28,3 million euros for diabetic medicines and 16,2 million euros for diabetic medical devices were used the same year. The purpose of our work is an overview of market dynamics of medicines for type 2 diabetes treatment between 2006 and 2017, among which metformin, sulfonylurea, DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase 4) inhibitors, glinide, GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1) analogues, SGLT-2 (sodium/glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors, α glucosidase inhibitors and glitazones were considered. Data from Medicinal products database, List of interchangeable medicinal products, Database of dispensed prescription medicines on expenses of health insurance, Health claims data on prescription drugs obtained from the Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia were obtained. In the beginning, a set of medicines prescribed between 2006 and 2017 were defined. The medicines were given market shares based on prescribed defined daily doses. Regulated and actual prices of medicines were converted to the values of month consumption. We also calculated chain price indexes of medicine groups. Sulfonylureas were the most prescribed group between 2006 and 2015. However, metformin was increasing its shares due to Slovenian guidelines for type 2 diabetes treatment recommendations which claims for it to be the first line medicine. Among sulfonylureas, gliclazide shares increased because of its cardiovascular benefits. DPP-4 inhibitors became the 3rd most prescribed group because they don’t cause hypoglycemia. Gliptines are meant for a specific diabetics population, so their shares were not bigger than 5 %. GLP-1 analogues are expensive drugs for subcutaneous application with shares below 2 %. SGLT-2 inhibitors are the most recent drugs that hit the market in 2014. Their shares remained below 1 %. The decrease was caused by new generic medicines in case of metformin, sulfonylureas and gliptines (40-70 % decrease). Similar effect occured in case of DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 analogs and SGLT-2 inhibitors due to new similar drugs or combinations (10-40 % decrease). Actual prices were lower than regulated ones, at most in case of SGLT-2 inhibitors (for 30 %) and metformin and glinides (for around 20 %). Prices depended on the amount of the drug itself in the case of metformin, but not in the case of gliclazide, glimepiride and repaglinide. Addition of metformin to DPP-4 inhibitors did not add any value to the price of a medicine. Chain price indexes represented general year-to-year decrease of both regulated and actual prices, especially due to arrival of new generic medicines, similar drugs and definition of new lists of interchangeable medicinal products. Groups of medicines with lower average prices were in general also prescribed more (DPP-4 inhibitors excluded).

Keywords:market dynamics type 2 diabetes regulated prices actual prices market shares

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back