izpis_h1_title_alt

ANALIZA DELA VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC IN TEMELJNIH SVOBOŠČIN V PRIMERJAVI Z ZAGOVORNIKOM NAČELA ENAKOSTI : diplomsko delo
Markelj, Vesna (Author), Pečarič, Mirko (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,61 MB)
MD5: F0B77951B88BF0124E16DC77C467995E

Abstract
Veliko prebivalcev v Republiki Sloveniji ne pozna pravnih aktov iz področja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter ustreznih organov, na katere se lahko obrnejo v primeru, kadar jim je kršena katera izmed pravic. Namen diplomskega dela je zato predstaviti pomen človekovih pravic, podrobneje preučiti in prikazati delo Varuha in Zagovornika na področju diskriminacije, ter ugotoviti, zakaj je bila ustanovitev Zagovornika v primerjavi z Varuhom na področju diskriminacije smiselna. Za doseganje ciljev v diplomskem delu so bile uporabljene deskriptivna metoda, metoda analize, statistična metoda in primerjalna metoda. Na podlagi teh metod in s pomočjo izbrane literature in virov smo opisali in analizirali delo Varuha in Zagovornika ter predstavili primere, v katerih je bila zaznana diskriminacija s strani obeh organov. V okviru analize smo ugotovili, da se delo Varuha in Zagovornika med seboj močno razlikujeta. Bistvena razlika se vidi že v tem, da Zagovornik poleg kršitev s strani javnega sektorja obravnava tudi kršitve s strani zasebnega sektorja. Prav tako smo ugotovili, da je bila ustanovitev Zagovornika v primerjavi z Varuhom smiselna, že samo zaradi takratne neusklajenosti slovenskega pravnega reda s pravnim redom Evropske unije. Prispevek raziskovanja lahko služi kot dober vir za seznanitev javnosti o delu Varuha in Zagovornika na področju diskriminacije. S tem prispevkom bi lahko v primeru, kadar menimo, da smo bili diskriminirani znali poiskati ustrezno pomoč.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Republika Slovenija, človekove pravice, Varuh, Zagovornik, javni sektor, zasebni sektor, Evropska unija, diskriminacija
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Tipology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Year:2020
Publisher:[V. Markelj]
Number of pages:VII, 51 str.
UDC:351.941
COBISS.SI-ID:28640259 This link opens in a new window
Views:313
Downloads:128
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:AN ANALYSIS OF OMBUDSMAN´S WORK COMPARED WITH ADVOCATE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITIY
Abstract:
Many people in the Republic of Slovenia are unaware of legal acts in the field of human rights and fundamental freedoms and the relevant bodies to which they can turn in the event of a violation of their rights. Therefore, the aim of this thesis is to present the importance of human rights, to examine and present the work of the Ombudsman and the Advocate in the field of discrimination in more detail and to determine why the establishment of the Advocate in comparison to the Ombudsman in the field of discrimination was sensible. We have used the descriptive method, the analytical method, the statistical method and the comparative method to achieve the objectives of the thesis. Based on these methods, we described and analysed the work of the Ombudsman and the Advocate and used the selected literature and sources to present the cases in which discrimination was found by both bodies. In the course of the analysis, we found out that the work of the Ombudsman and the Advocate differ considerably. The main difference is that the Advocate deals not only with violations by the public sector but also with violations by the private sector. We also found that the establishment of the Advocate made sense compared to the Ombudsman, as the Slovenian legal order was incompatible with the legal order of the European Union at that time. The research contribution can serve as a good source of information for the public about the work of the Ombudsman and the Advocate in the field of discrimination. With this contribution, we could seek appropriate help if we feel that we have been discriminated against.

Keywords:the Republic of Slovenia, human rights, Ombudsman, Advocate, public sector, private sector, European Union, discrimination

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back