izpis_h1_title_alt

Razlogi za in proti ponovni uvedbi sloke (Scolopax rusticola L.) na seznam lovnih vrst v Sloveniji : diplomsko delo - visokošolski strokovni študij
ID Bottosso, Matteo (Author), ID Jerina, Klemen (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,15 MB)
MD5: E5BABD4142576E3814783799BB9BCC34

Abstract
V nalogi smo osvetlili razloge za in proti uvrstitvi sloke med lovno divjad. Pri tem smo poskušali zajeti čim več dostopnih podatkov in objavljenih virov, ki so ustrezali postavljenim ciljem naloge. V Sloveniji je sloka od leta 1993 na seznamu zavarovanih vrst in jo pokriva Uredba o zavarovanju ogroženih živalskih vrst (Ur. l. RS. št. 57/1993). Pred tem je bila vrsta določena kot lovna z Zakonom o varstvu, gojitvi in lovu divjadi iz leta 1976. Lovci v Sloveniji so zainteresirani, da bi jo spet uvrstili med divjad. Temu izrazito nasprotujejo naravovarstvene organizacije, predvsem z utemeljitvami, da sloka v Sloveniji zelo redko gnezdi zaradi možnih zamenjav in odstrela drugih, bolj ogroženih vrst ptic, pa tudi zaradi možnih negativnih vplivov,ki bi lahko spremljali porast komercialnega lova predvsem tujih gostov. Proučili smo pretekli lov na sloko v Sloveniji v letih od 1985 do 1993. Odstrel je znašal od 1300 do 2000 ptic letno in je prostorsko zajemal skoraj celotno Slovenijo. Ker je sloka izrazito migratorna vrsta in gnezdi v večjem obsegu v severni Evropi, obstoj vrste v Sloveniji verjetno ni odvisen od uspešnosti gnezdenja na našem ozemlju, ampak od stanja globalne selitvene populacije v Evropi. Menimo, da bi ob upoštevanju domačih in tujih podatkov o splošni biologiji vrste sloka lahko bila tudi pri nas spet lovna, ker slovenski odstrel vrste ne ogroža, globalno ni ogrožena, je lovna v večjem delu Evrope, obenem pa je lov na vrsto donosen in bi številne lovce zanimal. Predhodno pa bi bilo treba proučiti/oceniti morebitne vplive lova na sloko na netarčne vrste, ki so bolj ogrožene in bi lahko prihajalo do zamenjav, in možne negativne vplive, ki bi lahko spremljali povečanje komercialnega lova.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:sloka, upravljanje, Scolopax rusticola
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Bottosso]
Year:2016
Number of pages:23 f.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-114909 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*15(043.2)=163.6
COBISS.SI-ID:4560806 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:30.03.2020
Views:728
Downloads:117
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Reasons for and against reintroduction of woodcock (Scolopax rusticola L.) on the list of gamespecies in Slovenia
Abstract:
In this work we performed a study on the reasons for and against the inclusion of woodcock between game species. In this study we tried to include all the available published study and data that meet the objectives of the task. In Slovenia, the species is since 1993 on the list of protected species and is covered by the Regulation on the protection of endangered animal species (Ur. l. RS, no. 57/1993). Before that, it was a game speciesregulated by the Law on the protection, breeding and hunting wild game from 1976. Hunters in Slovenia are interested torelist it among the game species. This is strongly oposedby conservation organizations, mainly based on arguments that the woodcock rarely breeds in Slovenia and also because of possible mistakes and culling of other, more endangered species. We examined the historical hunting of woodcock in Slovenia in the period from 1985 to 1993. Culling ranged from 1,300 to 2,000 birds killed per year and spatially covered almost the entire country. Since woodcock is highly migratory species and nests to a greater extent in northern Europe, the existence of population in Slovenia does not depend on the success of nesting in our territory, but on the status of global migration population in Europe. We believe that taking into account the existing domestic and foreign data on the general biology of the species, woodcock may alsoin Slovenia became game species, because Slovenian hunting of species does not endangere species globally, the species is being hunted in majority of Europe. It would be however necessary to examine the impacts of hunting woodcock on non-target species that are more threatened.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back