izpis_h1_title_alt

Uporaba PA projekcije namesto AP pri slikanju SIS
ID Mekiš, Nejc (Author), ID Mc Entee, Mark F. (Author)

URLURL - Source URL, Visit http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-3GJNDS4T This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Namen: Namen naše raziskave je bil ugotoviti v kolikšni meri se zmanjša vstopna kožna doza (VKD) in obsevanost testisov pri slikanju SIS v posteroanteriorni (PA) projekciji v primerjavi z anteroposteriorno (AP) projekcijo, ter v kolikšni meri se zmanjša ta obsevanost, če uporabimo svinčeno zaščito. Metode dela: V naši raziskavi smo merili vstopno kožno dozo pri slikanju SIS in dozo, ki jo prejmejo testisi, s pomočjo termoluminiscentnih dozimetrov (TLD), ki smo jih pritrdili v centru slikovnega polja in na testise. Pred izvajanjem meritev smo z različnimi ekspozicijskimi pogoji, ki so napisani v Evropskih smernicah naredili 10 rentgenogramov za vsako projekcijo. Glede na pridobljene meritve s produktom doze in površine (DAP), ter ocene kvalitet slik smo določili optimalne pogoje za izvajanje meritev. Rezultati: Glede na meritve DAP smo ugotovili, da je doza, ki jo prejme fantom pri enakih ekspozicijskih pogojih v PA, manjša kot v AP projekciji (p≤0,009), ni pa bilo statistično značilnih razlik v kvaliteti slik (p≤0,483). Doza, ki jo pacient prejme na testise v PA projekciji je pri slikanju SIS za 94% manjša kot doza, ki jo prejme v AP projekciji (p≤0,020; p≤0,019). Nismo ugotovili statistično značilnih razlik med prejeto dozo na testise pri meritvah z in brez uporabe svinčene zaščite (p≤0,559; p≤0,058). Zaključek: Iz pridobljenih rezultatov lahko sklepamo, da je pri slikanju SIS bolje uporabljati PA projekcijo, ker je doza, ki jo prejme moški na testise statistično značilno manjša od doze, ki jo bo prejel v AP projekciji. Uporaba klasične zaščite pri delih telesa, ki ležijo izven slikovnega polja pa ne prispeva veliko k zmanjšanju doze.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:sakroiliakalni sklepi, doza na testise, svinčena zaščita
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Year:2009
Number of pages:Str. 15-19
Numbering:Letn. 26, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-114443 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616-073
ISSN on article:1855-5136
URN:URN:NBN:SI:DOC-3GJNDS4T
COBISS.SI-ID:3930219 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:28.02.2020
Views:937
Downloads:99
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Bilten
Publisher:Društvo radioloških inženirjev Slovenije, Zbornica radioloških inženirjev Slovenije
ISSN:1855-5136
COBISS.SI-ID:241400320 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Use of PA projection instead of AP in SIJ imaging
Abstract:
Purpose: To determine the difference between scattered radiation emitted to testes in anterior (AP) and posterior (PA) projection of sacroiliac joint imaging in conventional radiography, with and without scrotum shield. Methods: The entrance skin dose (ESD) and the dose received by the testicles was measured on the phantom using termoluminiscent dosimeters (TLD). The optimisation was determined according to the European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, considering the quality of the image and the dose area product (DAP) measurement. Results: According to the DAP measurements we discovered that the dose received by the phantom in the same exposure conditions in PA is lower than in the AP projections (p≤0,009). However, there were no statistically signifi cant differences in the image quality (p≤0,483). The dose received by patient’s testicles in the PA projection in SIJ imaging is 94% lower than the dose received in the AP projection. No statistically signifi cant differences were determined between the dose received by the testicles in measurements with and without a scrotum shield in AP (p≤0,559; p≤0,058). Conclusion: We can conclude that it is better to use the PA projection in SIJ imaging, because the dose received by male testicles in signifi cantly lower than the dose received in the AP projection. The use of the classical protection used in the body parts outside the primary x-ray beam is not highly relevant for the reduction of the received dose in AP.

Keywords:sacroiliac joints, dose on testicles, lead shield

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back