Details

Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection
ID van Eeden, Lily M. (Author), ID Eklund, Ann (Author), ID Miller, Jennifer R. B. (Author), ID López-Bao, José Vicente (Author), ID Chapron, Guillaume (Author), ID Cejtin, Mikael R. (Author), ID Crowther, Mathew S. (Author), ID Dickman, Christopher R. (Author), ID Frank, Jens (Author), ID Krofel, Miha (Author), ID Macdonald, David W. (Author), ID McManus, Jeannine (Author), ID Meyer, Tara K. (Author), ID Middleton, Arthur D. (Author), ID Newsome, Thomas M. (Author), ID Ripple, William J. (Author), ID Ritchie, Euan G. (Author), ID Schmitz, Oswald J. (Author), ID Stoner, Kelly J. (Author), ID Tourani, Mahdieh (Author), ID Treves, Adrian (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,52 MB)
MD5: AD42F524EC104857EA708319473AE23B
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005577 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Carnivore predation on livestock often leads people to retaliate. Persecution by humans has contributed strongly to global endangerment of carnivores. Preventing livestock losses would help to achieve three goals common to many human societies: preserve nature, protect animal welfare, and safeguard human livelihoods. Between 2016 and 2018, four independent reviews evaluated >40 years of research on lethal and nonlethal interventions for reducing predation on livestock. From 114 studies, we find a striking conclusion: scarce quantitative comparisons of interventions and scarce comparisons against experimental controls preclude strong inference about the effectiveness of methods. For wise investment of public resources in protecting livestock and carnivores, evidence of effectiveness should be a prerequisite to policy making or large-scale funding of any method or, at a minimum, should be measured during implementation. An appropriate evidence base is needed, and we recommend a coalition of scientists and managers be formed to establish and encourage use of consistent standards in future experimental evaluations.

Language:English
Keywords:livestock, carnivory, livestock care, scientists, predation, conservation science, science policy, wolves
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2018
Number of pages:8 str.
Numbering:Vol. 16, iss. 9, art. e2005577
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-114210 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*1
ISSN on article:1545-7885
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005577 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:5196454 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:19.02.2020
Views:1707
Downloads:378
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:PLoS biology
Shortened title:PLoS biol.
Publisher:PLOS
ISSN:1545-7885
COBISS.SI-ID:2943764 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:mesojedci, zaščita živali, zaščita živine, predatorji

Projects

Funder:NSF - National Science Foundation
Project number:115057
Name:Coupled Human and Natural Systems

Funder:Spain, Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
Funding programme:Ramon & Cajal
Project number:RYC-2015-18932

Funder:National Geographic Society
Project number:WW-100C-17

Funder:George B. Storer Foundation

Funder:Derse Foundation

Funder:Fulbright Sweden

Funder:Carnegie Corporation of New York

Funder:Development Bank South Africa

Funder:Green Fund

Funder:United Nations Environment Program

Funder:Global Environment Facility

Funder:FORMAS - Swedish Research Council

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back