Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Toward objective assessment of the conservation status of (the Natura 2000) forest habitat types : a comparison of a qualitative and a quantitative modeling approach
ID
Kovač, Marko
(
Author
),
ID
Grošelj, Petra
(
Author
)
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.001
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(940,24 KB)
MD5: 25699C645EDF0B80A7DD1BC6114E8CEA
Image galllery
Abstract
To halt the loss of biodiversity in natural habitats, the EU passed the Habitats Directive and established the Natura 2000 network. The network captured forest habitats and habitat types, whose conservation status must be reported under Article 17 of the Directive. Hence, the harmonization of habitat assessment methods and reporting formats are a critical issue. So far, the EU Commission and Member States have managed to design and issue reporting guidelines. However, as many of these reports are largely based on expert opinions, they tend to be biased and incomparable. To make conservation status assessments and reporting more consistent, this study evaluated a set of indicators with two decision support models. The DEX model operated with linguistic statements derived from numerical values, while the fuzzy model utilized numeric input. Both models were tested with data from Slovenia's three largest forest habitat types (FHT), namely 9110 % Luzulo-Fagetum beech forests, 91K0 % Illyrian Fagus sylvatica forests (Aremonio-Fagion) and 91L0 % Illyrian oak-hornbeam forests (Erythronio-Carpinion), provided by the Forest and Forest Ecosystem Condition Survey. The DEX model produced uniform results and defined the conservation status of all three FHTs as least favorable. Conversely, the fuzzy model produced three different conservation status grades for the FHTs: a favorable conservation status for the 91K0 FHT, least favorable for the 9110 FHT and unfavorable for the 91L0 FHT. Its results were logical and in accord with the existing assessments. The study showed that both models could be used for the evaluation of FHT traits. However, because of its larger sensitivity, the fuzzy model allowed detecting subtle differences among the indicator values due to the use of continuous numerical data and more sophisticated mathematical procedures.
Language:
English
Keywords:
biodiversity
,
decision-making models
,
dex
,
fuzzy logic
,
inference rules
,
forest habitats
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Author Accepted Manuscript
Year:
2018
Number of pages:
Str. 281-289
Numbering:
Vol. 89
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-114206
UDC:
630*18
ISSN on article:
1470-160X
DOI:
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.001
COBISS.SI-ID:
5008294
Publication date in RUL:
19.02.2020
Views:
1610
Downloads:
389
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Ecological indicators : integrating, monitoring, assessment and management
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
1470-160X
COBISS.SI-ID:
912981
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:
The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:
20.02.2020
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
biodiverziteta
,
odločitveni modeli
,
dex
,
mehka logika
,
inferenčna pravila
,
gozdni habitati
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back