izpis_h1_title_alt

Merilna negotovost pri odmerjanju volumna
ID Gaber, Klara (Author), ID Gros, Nataša (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,33 MB)
MD5: 251C7194C696AB4AED2BE885A795AA4E

Abstract
Vsak pribor ima definirano neko mejo napake, znotraj tega intervala pa naj bi bil želen odmerjen volumen. V sklopu diplomske naloge smo preverjali merilno negotovost, pravilnost in natančnost posameznega volumetričnega pribora s statističnimi testi. V primerjavo smo vzeli polnilne pipete, birete, birete s kroglico, volumetrične steklenice in batne pipete. Pred eksperimentom smo pričakovali, da bo v splošnem najožje območje razširjene merilne negotovosti pri odmerjanju volumna z batno pipeto, največje pa bo pri odmerjanju volumna z volumetričnimi steklenicami. Ugotovili smo, da je območje razširjene merilne negotovosti močno odvisno od tega, kateri volumen smo odmerjali. V splošnem pa velja, da so za odmerjanje majhnih volumnov (do 1 mL) najbolj primerne batne pipete. Za odmerjanje večjih volumnov pa je bila najbolj primerna polnilna pipeta.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:volumetrični pribor, merilna negotovost, pravilnost, natančnost, točnost
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FKKT - Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology
Year:2019
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-113452 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:1538416579 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:08.01.2020
Views:3241
Downloads:368
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
Every volumetric instrument has its own error limit and within this area should be the desired volume. In diploma experiments we checked measurement uncertainty, trueness and precision of individual volumetric instrument with statistical tests. In comparison we took volumetric pipettes, burettes, burettes with bead stopcock, volumetric flasks and piston pipettes. Before the experiment we expected, the narrowest area of expanded measurement uncertainty with piston pipettes and the widest one with volumetric flasks. We found out that the area of expanded measurement uncertainty is strongly dependent on the measured volume. In general, we can say that for measurement of small volume (up to 1 mL) piston pipette is the most appropriate. For measurement of larger volume, the volumetric pipette is the most appropriate.

Keywords:volumetric instruments, measurement uncertainty, trueness, precision, accuracy

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back