izpis_h1_title_alt

Biotično zatiranje navadne pršice (Tetranychus urticae Koch) na hmelju s plenilsko pršico Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor)
ID Turnšek, Anja (Author), ID Trdan, Stanislav (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Rak Cizej, Magda (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,00 MB)
MD5: 4F90BC2135BBE4B99ED523F38C2C11F8

Abstract
Navadna pršica (Tetranychus urticae) je pomemben škodljivec hmelja. Za njeno zatiranje je v Sloveniji registrirano majhno število kemičnih pripravkov, tudi zato je škodljivec razvil odpornost na nekatere aktivne snovi. Leta 2015 smo v proizvodnem hmeljišču v Spodnji Savinjski dolini za varstvo hmelja pred navadno pršico vnesli plenilsko pršico Neoseiulus californicus. Učinkovitost plenilca smo spremljali s štetjem mobilnih osebkov in jajčec navadne pršice na listih hmelja na treh različnih višinah hmelja. Štetje smo opravili v štirih terminih, v vseh treh dekadah julija in prvi dekadi avgusta. Za primerjavo smo navadno pršico spremljali na rastlinah, kjer nismo nanašali akaricidov (negativna kontrola) in na rastlinah, kjer smo uporabljali akaricide za varstvo hmelja pred navadno pršico (pozitivna kontrola). Uporabili smo pripravka z aktivnima snovema abamektin (Vertimec Pro) in heksitiazoks (Nissorun 10 WP). Na rastlinah, kjer smo izvajali biotično varstvo, je število mobilnih oblik navadne pršice najprej upadlo, nato pa se ni več bistveno spreminjalo. Z gospodarskega vidika je pomemben podatek delež poškodovanosti storžkov hmelja. V vsakem obravnavanem postopku smo v štiri razrede, glede na poškodbe storžkov, razvrstili po 30 storžkov s srednje in 30 storžkov z zgornje višine rastline. V vseh obravnavanjih je bil največji delež nepoškodovanih in malo poškodovanih storžkov (0-5 % poškodb). Deleži poškodovanih storžkov se niso bistveno razlikovali med biotičnim (22,2 ± 6,3 %) in kemičnim varstvom (25,0 ± 5,0 % in 24,8 ± 5,6 %) ter kontrolo (25,0 ± 7,2 %).

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:hmeljarstvo, Humulus lupulus, biotično varstvo rastlin, navadna pršica, Tetranychus urticae, plenilska pršica, Neoseiulus californicus, poljski poskus
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publisher:[A. Turnšek]
Year:2019
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-113420 This link opens in a new window
UDC:632.937.1.03:595.42(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:9382009 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:02.01.2020
Views:1945
Downloads:185
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Biological control of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) on hop with predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor)
Abstract:
Two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) is an important pest of hop. For its control in Slovenia only few acaricides are registered, and also for this reason the pest already developed the resistance to some active ingredients. In 2015, we used for the first time the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus against two-spotted spider mite in hop garden in Spodnja Savinjska dolina. The efficacy of the predator was evaluated with counting the mobile stages and eggs of two-spotted spider mite on the leaves of hop on three different heights. The countings were performed four times, namely in all three decades of July and in the first decade of August. For comparison, two-spotted spider mites were monitored in hop plants, where no acaricides were used (negative control), and in hop plants, where acaricides were applied for controlling the mites (positive control). The acaricides we used in positive control were Vertimec Pro (active ingredient Abamectin), and Nissorun 10 WP (a.i. Hexythiazox). In the plants, where we used the biological control agents, the number of mobile stages decreased in the beginning, but afterwards the their number was stable. From the economical point of view, the percentage of hop cones injured from the two-spotted spider mite, is the most important. In all four treatments we classified 30 hop cones from the middle height and 30 hop cones from the highest height in four classes regarding the % of damage caused by two-spotted spider mite. In all four treatments we recorded the highest % of healthy (without injuries) and only slightly injured hop cones (0-5 % injuries). The % of injured hop cones was not statistically different among the treatments (control 25,0 ± 2,7 %, biological control 22,2 ± 6,3 %, FFS1 25,0 ± 5,0 %, FFS2 24,8 ± 5,6 %).

Keywords:hop, Humulus lupulus, biotic control, two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus, field experiment

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back