izpis_h1_title_alt

Medverski dialog in (po)nov(n)a evangelizacija v Sloveniji
ID Turnšek, Marjan (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-QGUMCAW9 This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (380,99 KB)
MD5: E8F445C320888B950D406D5B1A2E3AB7
URLURL - Source URL, Visit http://www.teof.uni-lj.si/uploads/File/Edinost/68/edinost23-40.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
V razpravi je izpostavljenih nekaj vidikov medverskega dialoga, ki je po 2. vat. c. z. postavljen v okvir nove evangelizacije; s tem se postavlja vprašanje, ali je ʺsredstvoʺ v procesu evangelizacije ali ima vrednost sam v sebi. Od koncilske odprtosti drugim verstvom, ki jo je precej jasno nakazal papež Pavel VI. v encikliki Ecclesiam Suam med kocilom samim, je v razpravi prikazan nadaljnji razvoj s primeri teoloških razpravljanj na simpozijih in kongresih, kar je premislek uvrstilo tudi na sinodo škofov v Rimu leta 1974, kjer se je začutila spet neka zadržanost. Delno jo je premagala že papeževa posinodalna spodbuda Evangelii Nuntiandi, še bolj pa papeži bl. Janez Pavel II., Benedikt XVI. in Frančišek, ki so medverskemu dialogu tako v teoriji kot v praksi dali nov polet. Drugi del razprave prikazuje to problematiko v Sloveniji. Do osamosvojitve Slovenije ni bilo vidnejšega medverskega dialoga; z večjo versko svobodo se je nato pričel in se najbolj uresničeval v zagovarjanju skupnih vrednot v odnosu do zakonodaje, manj je bilo znanstvenih posvetovanj in medverskih srečanj. Zanimiva je ugotovitev, da je bila tematika dialoga šibko prisotna v procesu plenarnega zbora. Najšibkejši je bil dialog na področju medsebojnega spoznavanja o tipično verskih vprašanjih. Zato ostaja prav to področje največji izziv za prihodnost.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:medverski dialog, islam, nova evangelizacija
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:TEOF - Theological Faculty
Year:2013
Number of pages:Str. 23-40
Numbering:Letn. 1 (68), št. 1/2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-108966 This link opens in a new window
UDC:2-675(497.4)
ISSN on article:2335-4127
URN:URN:NBN:SI:DOC-QGUMCAW9
COBISS.SI-ID:9967619 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:18.08.2019
Views:854
Downloads:260
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Edinost in dialog
Publisher:Inštitut za ekumensko teologijo in medreligijski dialog pri Teološki fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani
ISSN:2335-4127
COBISS.SI-ID:268194560 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Interreligious dialogue and repeated (new) evangelization in Slovenia
Abstract:
In this paper, some aspects of the interreligious dialogue, which has found its place after the Second Vatican Council withing the framework of the New Evangelisation, are emphasised. Hence, the question arises whether it is only ʺan instrumentʺ in the process of Evangelisation or has its own inherent value. Beginning with the openness of the council towards other religions, which was emphasised very clearly by the Pope Paul VI in his encyclical Ecclesia Suam during the Council itself, this paper analyses further developments, citing examples of theological discussions from various symposia and congress. Interreligious dialogue was also a topic at the Synod of Bishops in 1974, where a kind of restraint was felt again. It was partly overrode already by the Popeʼs post-synodal exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi, but even more by activities of the Blessed Popes John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis, who gave interreligious dialogue new power, both theoretically and practically. The second part of the paper depicts the development of the interreligious dialogue in Slovenia. Before the state independence of our country, it was not very visible. Encouraged by the greater religious freedom after 1991, it made important progress and mainly been realised by championing the same common values regarding legislation, but there have been significantly fewer scientific deliberations and interreligious meetings. It is interresting to observe that the topic of dialogue was weakly represented during the process of the Plenary Council. The religious dialogue in the area of the mutual spreading of knowledge regarding typically religious questions has been even weaker. Therefore, it is exactly this area remains the greatest challenge for the future.

Keywords:interreligious dialogue, Islam, new evangelization

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back