izpis_h1_title_alt

ANALIZA REGULACIJE IN KRŠITVE NAČELA ZASLIŠANJA STRANKE V UPRAVNIH POSTOPKIH
ID Rudolf, Grega (Author), ID Kovač, Polonca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,43 MB)
MD5: BFB5C219499308090BE302A2C4E53AEC

Abstract
Načelo zaslišanja stranke predstavlja temelj varstva pravic strank tekom vsakega odločanja upravnih organov. Namen diplomskega dela je bilo ugotoviti, na kakšen način ter v kolikšni meri se načelo zagotavlja v upravnih postopkih, kot tudi kakšne so oblike varstva pravic strank v povezavi s kršitvami tega načela. Namen je bil tudi primerjati slovensko ureditev načela zaslišanja s kanadsko ureditvijo ter ugotoviti, katere so najpogostejše kršitve načela zaslišanja stranke v slovenskem sistemu. Da sem ugotovil, katero področje je glede kršitev načela zaslišanja stranke najbolj problematično, sem primerjal letna poročila Varuha človekovih pravic, izvedel intervjuje s tremi deležniki, ki so vsak z različnih pogledov vpeti v sistem upravnih postopkov ter preučil sodno prakso Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije. Poleg tega sem analiziral primarne in sekundarne vire, da sem ugotovil urejenost področja v Kanadi in Sloveniji, ju medsebojno primerjal in ugotovil stične točke. Prek analize, tako literature kot judikatov, letnih poročil in izvedenih intervjujev sem ugotovil, da je pomembnost načela zaslišanja stranke v očeh upravnih organov dostikrat spregledana. Do kršitev prihaja predvsem na področjih priseljevanja in prosilcev mednarodne zaščite, ranljive pa so tudi skupine otrok, rejništva ter invalidov. Pomen mojega diplomskega dela in uporabnost le-tega predpisujem predvsem večjemu zavedanju pomembnosti načela zaslišanja stranke vsem, ki odločajo, ali bodo v prihodnosti odločali o pravicah, obveznostih in pravnih koristih strank. Z diplomskim delom prikazujem morebitne kršitve načela zaslišanja stranke ter načine, kako se tem kršitvam izogniti. Z večjim zavedanjem in razumevanjem celosti problema in načela nasploh pa bodo odločitve bolj transparente, legitimne in pravilne.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:ustavno varstvo pravic strank, načelo zaslišanja stranke, biti slišan, izjaviti se, upravni postopki, ZUP, analiza poročil in sodne prakse, Slovenija in Kanada
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Year:2019
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-108518 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.07.2019
Views:2267
Downloads:691
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:THE ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATION AND THE VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD PRINCIPLE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
Abstract:
The right to be heard principle is the basis of the protection of human rights during each decision of the administrative bodies. The purpose of my bachelor’s degree is to determine in what manner and to what extent the principle is ensured in administrative procedures, and what are the forms of the right to be heard principle protection in connection with violations of this principle. The purpose is also to compare the Slovenian regulation with the Canadian regulation, and to find out, which are the most frequent violations of the principle to be heard in the Slovenian system. To find the most problematic area regarding the violation of the principle, I compared the annual reports of the Ombudsman, conducted interviews with three entities, each from different perspective of the system of administrative procedures, and studied the case-law of the Supreme Court of Slovenia. In addition, I analysed the primary and the secondary resources to determine the orderliness of the field in Canada and Slovenia, compared them to each other and established contact points. Through the analysis of literature and judicial judgments, annual reports and interviews, I realized that the importance of the right to be heard principle in the eyes of the administrative bodies is often overlooked. The violations mainly occur in the areas of immigration and international protection applicants, while groups of children, foster care and people with disabilities are also vulnerable. The importance and usability of my bachelor’s thesis is to be aware of the significance of the right to be heard principle to all who make decisions now or in the future. With the bachelor’s thesis, I am presenting possible violations of the right to be heard principle and the ways in which those violations are avoided. With greater awareness and understanding the problem’s integrity and the principle in general, decisions will be more transparent, legitimate and correct.

Keywords:Fundamental rights, the right to be heard, due process, administrative procedures, duty to inform, participation, General Administrative Procedure Act, Report and case-law analysis, Slovenia and Canada

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back