Primerjava pridelka ajde med konvencionalno in ohranitveno obdelavo tal

Klement, Timotej (author), Bernik, Rajko (mentor)

V diplomski nalogi smo se odločili za poizkus primerjave obdelav tal in sicer zaradi zanimanja funkcionalnosti ter ekonomičnosti na lastnih površinah. Naš namen je bil ugotoviti, katera obdelava tal (konvencionalna obdelava z oranjem, konzervirajoča obdelava in neposredna setev v strnišče) nam najbolj ustreza za setev ajde (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) po strnišču. Ugotavljali smo, koliko časa smo porabili in kolikšna je bila poraba goriva za posamezen postopek priprave tal za setev. Zanimala sta nas tudi pridelek in končni izid v ekonomičnosti. Za točnost podatkov raziskave smo postopke opravljali z istim traktorjem. Ugotovili smo, da manj časa in goriva (60 % manj kot pri konvencionalni obdelavi tal) porabimo pri konzervirajoči obdelavi tal brez dopolnilne obdelave. Več časa (210min/ha) in goriva (32l/ha) se porabi pri konvencionalni obdelavi, vendar sta bila rast in razvoj rastlin intenzivnejša. Pridelek je bil pri konvencionalni obdelavi največji 968kg/ha (24% večji kot pri sledeči konzervirajoči obdelavi tal), vendar je izračun pokazal, da nam največ zaslužka ostane pri konzervirajoči obdelavi brez dopolnilne obdelave tal (20% več kot pri konvencionalni obdelavi tal).

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: konvencionalna obdelava tal, konzervirajoča obdelava tal, ajda, pridelek
• Work type: Bachelor thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
• Organization: BF - Biotechnical Faculty
• Publisher: [T. Klement]
• Year: 2019
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-108291
• UDC: 633.12:631.559:631.58(043.2)
• COBISS.SI-ID: 9242745
• Publication date in RUL: 26.06.2019

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: Comparison of buckwheat yield between conventional and conservation tillage

Abstract

In our dissertation, we decided to try two different way how to prepare ground for sowing and then compare the results. We wanted to find out which ground suits (conventional treatment with plowing, conservation treatment and direct sowing in stubble) us best for buckwheat sowing (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) on stubble field. We wanted to find out how much time did we spend, and how much fuel did we use for a single proceeding preparing ground for sowing. We were also curios about the outcome of harvesting and final economical outcome. For all the processes we used the same tractor. Our conclusion was that the least time and fuel (60% lower than convetional soil treatment) was used in conservational preparing of ground – without extra treatment. A lot more time (210min/ha) and fuel was used (32l/ha) in conventional preparing of ground for sowing, but the growth and development of plants was more intense. Also, the growth of weed was more intense in conservational treatment of ground in comparison with conventional preparing of ground. The harvest was with conventional ground treatment bigger 968kg/ha (24% higher than the following conversation soil treatment), but the economical outcome has shown us, that we have more profit with conservational ground treatment (20% more than convetional soil treatment).

• Keywords: conventional tilage, conversation tillage, buckwheat, crop yield